Teams

disCOMBObulated

2025 COMBO · Women 9.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.71 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-13vs deucebagsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichelle DaCosta / Holly Hayes vs Claudia Samaniego / Joanie Bryant4-5
L#2 DoublesShelly Works / Ava Wood vs Ariel Aung / Stacey Boebel0-6, 3-6
2025-04-13vs deucebagsLost 02
L#1 DoublesShelly Works / Ava Wood vs KELLY COOPER / Kristen Fowler3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRuth Lawson / Kailey Jonas vs Joanie Bryant / Nina Ciric Alves7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-12vs deucebagsWon 21
W#1 DoublesChelsea Horan / Kailey Jonas vs Ariel Aung / Catherine Herlich6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichelle DaCosta / Ruth Lawson vs KELLY COOPER / Nina Ciric Alves6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEtresia Godoy / Ava Wood vs Diana Riechel / Claudia Samaniego6-4, 7-5
2025-04-12vs deucebagsWon 30
W#1 DoublesChelsea Horan / Bailey Godwin vs Ariel Aung / Claudia Samaniego6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEtresia Godoy / Holly Hayes vs Joanie Bryant / Pinky Cruz-Osterman2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Martinez / Ruth Lawson vs Diana Riechel / Sonya Castro6-4, 6-0
2025-04-11vs deucebagsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMariel Tinnirello / Julie Alvarez vs Svenja Fuhrig / Catherine Herlich6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChelsea Horan / Ruth Lawson vs Guillen Elisa / Kristen Fowler6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle DaCosta / Ava Wood vs KELLY COOPER / Claudia Samaniego4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 9.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.46 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.99
Chelsea Horan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
Antea Dedic
published 5
Bailey Godwin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Etresia Godoy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.74
Julie Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.55
Michelle DaCosta
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.43
Michelle Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.38
Ruth Lawson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Beverly Rowland
published 4.5
4.19
Holly Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.91
Ava Wood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Kailey Jonas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mariel Tinnirello
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shelly Works
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Rowland + Holly Hayes224 matchesnot enough data
Chelsea Horan + Ruth Lawson404 matchesnot enough data
Shelly Works + Ava Wood033 matchesnot enough data
Ava Wood + Holly Hayes123 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Martinez + Ruth Lawson213 matchesnot enough data
Michelle DaCosta + Chelsea Horan303 matchesnot enough data
Michelle DaCosta + Ruth Lawson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Chelsea Horan
20W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
4.99
5
Antea Dedic
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Bailey Godwin
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
5
Etresia Godoy
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Alvarez
22W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%3%97%
4.74
Michelle DaCosta
15W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.55
Michelle Martinez
15W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
4.43
Ruth Lawson
30W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Beverly Rowland
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Holly Hayes
18W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
4
Ava Wood
12W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.91
Kailey Jonas
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mariel Tinnirello
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shelly Works
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.