Teams

deucebags

2025 COMBO · Women 9.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.67 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-13vs disCOMBObulatedWon 20
W#1 DoublesClaudia Samaniego / Joanie Bryant vs Michelle DaCosta / Holly Hayes5-4
W#2 DoublesAriel Aung / Stacey Boebel vs Shelly Works / Ava Wood6-0, 6-3
2025-04-13vs disCOMBObulatedWon 20
W#1 DoublesKELLY COOPER / Kristen Fowler vs Shelly Works / Ava Wood6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoanie Bryant / Nina Ciric Alves vs Ruth Lawson / Kailey Jonas6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-04-12vs disCOMBObulatedLost 12
L#1 DoublesAriel Aung / Catherine Herlich vs Chelsea Horan / Kailey Jonas0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKELLY COOPER / Nina Ciric Alves vs Michelle DaCosta / Ruth Lawson1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiana Riechel / Claudia Samaniego vs Etresia Godoy / Ava Wood4-6, 5-7
2025-04-12vs disCOMBObulatedLost 03
L#1 DoublesAriel Aung / Claudia Samaniego vs Chelsea Horan / Bailey Godwin1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoanie Bryant / Pinky Cruz-Osterman vs Etresia Godoy / Holly Hayes2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiana Riechel / Sonya Castro vs Michelle Martinez / Ruth Lawson4-6, 0-6
2025-04-11vs disCOMBObulatedLost 12
L#1 DoublesSvenja Fuhrig / Catherine Herlich vs Mariel Tinnirello / Julie Alvarez1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGuillen Elisa / Kristen Fowler vs Chelsea Horan / Ruth Lawson1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKELLY COOPER / Claudia Samaniego vs Michelle DaCosta / Ava Wood6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 9.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.37 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.63
KELLY COOPER
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.54
Stacey Boebel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.54
Nina Ciric Alves
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.46
Lauren Villegas
published
4.41
Diana Riechel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.37
Svenja Fuhrig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.35
Ariel Aung
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.31
Claudia Samaniego
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Catherine Herlich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Guillen Elisa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Pinky Cruz-Osterman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Kristen Fowler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.13
Courtney O'Daniel
published 4.5
Joanie Bryant
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sonya Castro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Svenja Fuhrig + Lauren Villegas6258% games+3.5% vs expected
Stacey Boebel + Courtney O'Daniel123 matchesnot enough data
Svenja Fuhrig + Ariel Aung033 matchesnot enough data
Claudia Samaniego + KELLY COOPER123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

KELLY COOPER
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
4.63
Stacey Boebel
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%38%62%
4.54
Nina Ciric Alves
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.54
Lauren Villegas
28W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
4.46
5
Diana Riechel
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
4.41
Svenja Fuhrig
20W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%16%
4.37
5
Ariel Aung
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
4.35
4.5
Claudia Samaniego
8W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Catherine Herlich
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Guillen Elisa
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Pinky Cruz-Osterman
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
Kristen Fowler
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Courtney O'Daniel
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
4.13
Joanie Bryant
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sonya Castro
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.