Teams

SwisherScott/Foothills

2025 Foothills Combo Doubles - 18 & over · 8.5 Combo Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 8.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Amanda Berry
published 4.5
4.02
Jordan Peters
published
3.99
Meng-shen Kan
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.86
Robin Szalanski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Mary Marvin
published
3.78
Karen Tonks
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Helen Woy
published 4
3.67
Jenette Swisher
published 4
3.63
Candace Scott
published 4
3.63
Sunday Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Alisa Crooks
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alisa Crooks + Jenette Swisher8455% games−0.7% vs expected
Helen Woy + Jenette Swisher261453% games−1.3% vs expected
Helen Woy + Alisa Crooks5451% gamesnot enough data
Sunday Richardson + Karen Tonks314 matchesnot enough data
Sunday Richardson + Jenette Swisher213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amanda Berry
156W–74L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
Jordan Peters
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.02
4
Meng-shen Kan
31W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Robin Szalanski
37W–24L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
Mary Marvin
23W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.85
4
Karen Tonks
123W–132L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Helen Woy
101W–62L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Jenette Swisher
166W–82L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Candace Scott
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Sunday Richardson
128W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Alisa Crooks
168W–77L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.