Teams

Idaho/Neill/18&Over5.0M

2024 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

8 players · average NTRP 5.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings3 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Neill/18&Over5.0M10024617236
21 yr Older, 1 yr Better?46161430277
3Has-Beens & Never-Be's 5.01952550336

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.66 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.87
Dan Buckingham
published 5
4.77
Thomas Schoeck
published
Anthony Hunt
published 5
Cory Dalos
published 5
Jemre Okoh
published 5
4.70
Masimba Ruwo
published 5
4.52
Tyler Neill
published 5
4.46
Seth Mikkelson
published 5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anthony Hunt + Tyler Neill141052% games−10.9% vs expected
Tyler Neill + Dan Buckingham4352% gamesnot enough data
Seth Mikkelson + Anthony Hunt6064% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Schoeck + Tyler Neill314 matchesnot enough data
Cory Dalos + Anthony Hunt303 matchesnot enough data
Anthony Hunt + Thomas Schoeck303 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Schoeck + Masimba Ruwo303 matchesnot enough data
Masimba Ruwo + Tyler Neill213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Dan Buckingham
127W–54L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.87
Thomas Schoeck
28W–10L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.77
5
Anthony Hunt
193W–55L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
5
Cory Dalos
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
5
Jemre Okoh
68W–81L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
5
Masimba Ruwo
92W–56L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.70
5
Tyler Neill
99W–81L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.52
5
Seth Mikkelson
17W–22L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.