Teams

Has-Beens & Never-Be's 5.0

2024 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

10 players · average NTRP 4.83 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-06-17vs 1 yr Older, 1 yr Better?Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Banks / Nicholas Szczurek vs Isaac Dodd / Rory Heggie2-6, 2-6
2024-06-12vs Idaho/Neill/18&Over5.0MLost 01
L#1 SinglesNicholas Szczurek vs Dan Buckingham3-6, 4-6
2024-05-20vs Idaho/Neill/18&Over5.0MLost 01
L#1 SinglesNicholas Szczurek vs Dan Buckingham4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Neill/18&Over5.0M10024617236
21 yr Older, 1 yr Better?46161430277
3Has-Beens & Never-Be's 5.01952550336

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.41 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.78
Mark Nielsen
published 5
David Brown
published 5
Jake Berriochoa
published 5
Mark DeMaine
published 5
Michael Banks
published 5
4.55
Peter Questad
published 5
4.45
Richard Davey
published 4.5
4.37
Kelly Bokn
published 4.5
3.92
Christian Questad
published 4.5
Nicholas Szczurek
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Questad + Mark Nielsen6354% games+5.7% vs expected
Christian Questad + Mark DeMaine2445% games−1.8% vs expected
Christian Questad + Richard Davey3350% games−8.5% vs expected
Christian Questad + Kelly Bokn044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Mark Nielsen
36W–12L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.78
5
David Brown
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
5
Jake Berriochoa
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
5
Mark DeMaine
22W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
5
Michael Banks
18W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
5
Peter Questad
120W–45L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.55
4.5
Richard Davey
44W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
4.45
4.5
Kelly Bokn
72W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
4.37
4.5
Christian Questad
60W–79L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.92
Nicholas Szczurek
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.