← Search

Nicholas Szczurek

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Boise, ID
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 8W–9L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history17 matches
L
2026-05-09 · Lil Rascals 9.0 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Oleksandra Ivanova mixed
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-11 · Lil Rascals 9.0 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kellee Bates mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-26 · Lil Rascals 9.0 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Hanna Jacobs mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-03-23 · Lil Rascals 9.0 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kellee Bates mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-03-08 · Lil Rascals 9.0 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tzu-Hui Chen mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-02 · Lil Rascals 9.0 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kellee Bates mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
L
2024-06-17 · Has-Beens & Never-Be's 5.0 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Michael Banks
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-12 · Has-Beens & Never-Be's 5.0 · #1 Singles · 5.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-05-20 · Has-Beens & Never-Be's 5.0 · #1 Singles · 5.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2023-04-16 · PTSA 9.0 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Suzanna Murali mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-7
L
2023-04-08 · PTSA 9.0 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tyler Tims mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W
2022-10-17 · Szczurek · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 32% of games
9.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 47% of the time
#1 Singles
47%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe