Teams

NLeCroy (Weddington)

2025 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Thurs PM

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-10vs GEstrada (Jeff Adams)Split 11
L#2 SinglesMike Gentile vs Daniel Gonzalez5-7, 3-6
W#3 SinglesVladislav Valtsis vs Ivan Blakeney5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-03vs MKrasniewski (Park Road)Won 20
W#1 SinglesBradley Holcman vs Grant Reuter6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAdam Dawson vs Keqin Huang6-1, 6-1
2025-06-26vs EWeinbrenner (Lifetime)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesBradley Holcman vs Tiger Zhang7-5, 0-3
L#3 SinglesVladislav Valtsis vs Brandon Pruski2-6, 3-6
2025-06-19vs JDichak (WSRC)Split 11
W#2 SinglesNicholas LeCroy vs Caden Greer6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesEric Bostic vs John Berger4-6, 2-6
2025-06-18vs CBiedrzycki (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesVladislav Valtsis vs Carl Jacobs2-6, 1-6
2025-06-15vs ABeaver (Jeff Adams)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesBradley Holcman vs Alec Beaver6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMike Gentile vs Asaf Ravid2-6, 3-6
2025-06-01vs KMann (Queens)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesAdam Dawson vs Sean Karasik2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesBrett Harrell vs Kellan Mann6-3, 7-6
L#3 SinglesNicholas LeCroy vs John Roberts4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Nicholas LeCroy
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.64
Brett Harrell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Adam Dawson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.45
Bradley Holcman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Mike Gentile
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Eric Bostic
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Vladislav Valtsis
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Harrell + Nicholas LeCroy21566% games+8.7% vs expected
Eric Bostic + Brett Harrell4252% gamesnot enough data
Nicholas LeCroy + Bradley Holcman4162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nicholas LeCroy
66W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.66
3.5
Brett Harrell
75W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.64
3.5
Adam Dawson
37W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Bradley Holcman
63W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Mike Gentile
115W–104L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Eric Bostic
33W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
Vladislav Valtsis
16W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.