Teams

GSCC RED

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS

4 players · average NTRP / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-10vs BASALT BLACKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKate Dehm / Elizabeth Malloy vs Nancy Garrigus / Lauren Mirich3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Kaufman / Heidi McCullough vs Audrey Allen / Desiree Pimentel6-3, 6-4
2026-06-08vs BASALT BLACKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHeidi McCullough / Kate Dehm vs Dena Albright / Nancy Garrigus2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Malloy / Julie Kaufman vs Audrey Allen / Desiree Pimentel6-2, 6-1
2026-05-27vs GSCC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesKatherine Proctor / Heidi McCullough vs Molly Hamilton / Cari Barber1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKate Dehm / Elizabeth Malloy vs Rachael Degraffenried / Silvia Barajas7-5, 6-4
2026-05-18vs GSCC BLUELost 02
L#1 SinglesKatherine Proctor vs Molly Hamilton3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Malloy / Heidi McCullough vs Silvia Barajas / Debbie Birch2-6, 2-6
2026-05-16vs BASALT BLACKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKatherine Proctor / Julie Kaufman vs Nancy Garrigus / Dena Albright4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Malloy / Heidi McCullough vs Melissa Knight / Grace Wright6-0, 6-0
2026-05-04vs GSCC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristin Davis / Elizabeth Malloy vs Molly Hamilton / Bailey Mccallister1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKate Dehm vs Silvia Barajas3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesHeidi McCullough / Katherine Proctor vs Cari Barber / Debbie Birch6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.20 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.31
Elizabeth Malloy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.27
Kate Dehm
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.14
Katherine Proctor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.09
Heidi McCullough
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Dehm + Elizabeth Malloy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Malloy
6W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
Kate Dehm
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Katherine Proctor
4W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.14
Heidi McCullough
5W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.