Teams

GSCC BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-03vs BASALT BLACKWon 20
W#1 DoublesCari Barber / Molly Hamilton vs Lauren Mirich / Grace Wright6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSilvia Barajas vs Audrey Allen6-2, 6-0
2026-06-01vs BASALT BLACKWon 30
W#1 DoublesMolly Hamilton / Bailey Mccallister vs Dena Albright / Audrey Allen6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSilvia Barajas vs Ginger Opp6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDebbie Birch / Rachael Degraffenried vs Desiree Pimentel / Melissa Knight7-5, 6-3
2026-05-27vs GSCC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesMolly Hamilton / Cari Barber vs Katherine Proctor / Heidi McCullough6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesBailey Mccallister vs Kristin Davis3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRachael Degraffenried / Silvia Barajas vs Kate Dehm / Elizabeth Malloy5-7, 4-6
2026-05-18vs GSCC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCari Barber / Bailey Mccallister vs Kristin Davis / Julie Kaufman3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSilvia Barajas / Debbie Birch vs Elizabeth Malloy / Heidi McCullough6-2, 6-2
2026-05-11vs BASALT BLACKLost 12
L#1 DoublesMolly Hamilton / Silvia Barajas vs Lauren Mirich / Nancy Garrigus6-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesRachael Degraffenried vs Dena Albright7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDebbie Birch / Bailey Mccallister vs Ginger Opp / Grace Wright3-6, 1-6
2026-05-04vs GSCC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMolly Hamilton / Bailey Mccallister vs Kristin Davis / Elizabeth Malloy6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSilvia Barajas vs Kate Dehm6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCari Barber / Debbie Birch vs Heidi McCullough / Katherine Proctor3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.41
Cari Barber
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.39
Debbie Birch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Silvia Barajas
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.10
Bailey Mccallister
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.08
Rachael Degraffenried
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Cari Barber
8W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
2.5
Debbie Birch
14W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.39
Silvia Barajas
9W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.35
2.5
Bailey Mccallister
4W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Rachael Degraffenried
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.