Teams

Team 11 Stringing Winners

2025 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-06-22vs Team 7 WolvesLost 01
L#2 SinglesHung Le vs Jesse Tu2-6, 2-6
2025-06-20vs Team 5 RacqueteersSplit 11
L#1 SinglesDante Paragas vs Bryan Bassig3-6, 5-4
W#3 DoublesHung Le / Praveen Mullacherry vs Sameer Farah / Nobuyasu Sugimoto6-4, 6-1
2025-06-01Won 10
W#2 SinglesHung Le vs Matthew Troutman6-3, 6-1
2025-05-09vs Team 1 District AcesWon 10
W#1 SinglesTom Tran Nguyen vs Braden Field7-6, 4-1
2025-05-01Lost 01
L#2 SinglesDante Paragas vs Patrick Hendy4-6, 1-4
2025-04-26vs Team 10 DMV AmigosWon 10
W#1 DoublesTom Tran Nguyen / Jason Guthrie vs Randy Lee / Tariq Haddad6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-19vs Team 8 PiF3.5 18Split 11
W#1 DoublesBen Keating / Tom Tran Nguyen vs Thomas McCrary / Keenan Keeling6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesHung Le / Doan Nguyen vs Marc Sendich / Mark Allen0-6, 2-6
2025-04-18vs Team 4 Who Is We? EvolutionLost 02
L#2 DoublesHung Le / Praveen Mullacherry vs David Kim / Warren Chen0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTan Nguyen / Tom Tran Nguyen vs Mike Ly / Luo Dong2-6, 2-6
2025-04-12vs Team 6 Serve AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesTan Nguyen / Tom Tran Nguyen vs JR Carreras / Jake Jacoby6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBen Keating / Dante Paragas vs Peter Beeman / Eric Hopkins6-4, 5-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Doan Nguyen
published
3.46
Ben Keating
published 3.5
3.42
Tom Tran Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.40
Hung Le
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Dante Paragas
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
3.16
Jason Guthrie
published
2.78
Luan Nguyen
published
Praveen Mullacherry
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Doan Nguyen
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.49
3.5
Ben Keating
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Tom Tran Nguyen
70W–73L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
Hung Le
44W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Dante Paragas
72W–63L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Shanmuganathan Arumugam
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Jason Guthrie
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Luan Nguyen
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Praveen Mullacherry
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.