Teams

SCC - Padgett

2025 SATA USTA Adult 65 & Over (Women) - Spring · Women 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.17 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-09vs SATA/Leigh Givens-UlmerLost 03
L#1 DoublesVirginia Shealy / D Hendry vs Claire ODonnell / Betsey Andersen1-6, 3-3
L#2 DoublesRisa Clawson / Lisa Harper vs Denise Larson / Liz Hagen3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Swinson / Linda Trull vs Grace Cause / Judith Mella2-6, 2-6
2025-04-02vs CRC - HarrisLost 12
L#1 DoublesD Hendry / Janis Johnson vs Regina Graham / Monique Belli5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShirley Roberts / Norma Robinson vs Debbie Harris / Loretta Bridgeforth7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Miller / Suzanne Swinson vs Bonnie Dixon / Janee Przybyl6-4, 6-4
2025-03-26vs Landings - LibbeLost 03
L#1 DoublesRisa Clawson / Lisa Harper vs Marianne Cleary / Katie Libbe0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Trull / Suzanne Swinson vs Cynthia Winski / Leslie Shields3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeverly Long / Susan Reese vs Constance Bertkau / Susan Anderson0-6, 3-6
2025-03-19vs Landings - AllenWon 21
W#1 DoublesVirginia Shealy / D Hendry vs Sandra Ingham / Ida Zeger6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa Harper / Risa Clawson vs Sandy Caruso / Pat Mitchell6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCatherine Miller / Susan Reese vs Sally Dunphy / Blaine Twibell4-6, 4-6
2025-03-17vs SATA/Leigh Givens-UlmerLost 03
L#1 DoublesD Hendry / Suzanne Swinson vs Leigh Givens-Ulmer / Barbara Capes0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesShirley Roberts / Linda Trull vs Karen Haase / Denise Larson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNorma Robinson / Catherine Miller vs Nancy McGirr / Jodi Holmes0-6, 0-6
2025-02-26vs CRC - HarrisLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Harper / Suzanne Swinson vs Monique Belli / Loretta Bridgeforth3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVirginia Shealy / Edith Padgett vs Mary Jo Hogan / Paula Parrish5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBeverly Long / Norma Robinson vs Bonnie Dixon / Janee Przybyl2-6, 6-7
2025-02-25vs Landings - LibbeLost 12
W#1 DoublesD Hendry / Virginia Shealy vs Colette Nichols / Marianne Cleary6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Harper / Janis Johnson vs Leslie Shields / Susan Anderson1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCatherine Miller / Caroline Hopkins vs Constance Bertkau / Debbie Giordan1-6, 0-6
2025-02-12vs Landings - AllenWon 21
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Swinson / Norma Robinson vs Ida Zeger / Sandra Ingham1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJanis Johnson / Linda Trull vs Nedra Weaver / Sandy Caruso1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVirginia Shealy / D Hendry vs Anita Seipel / Sandy Randolph6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Virginia Shealy
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.17
Lisa Harper
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.15
D Hendry
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.11
Robin Greco
published
3.01
Suzanne Swinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Mary Caggiano
published
2.86
Susan Reese
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Norma Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
Edith Padgett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Beverly Long
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Catherine Miller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Janis Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Linda Trull
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Risa Clawson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Shirley Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Greco + Norma Robinson10360% games+3.0% vs expected
D Hendry + Virginia Shealy3355% games+2.0% vs expected
Suzanne Swinson + Norma Robinson033 matchesnot enough data
Risa Clawson + Lisa Harper123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Virginia Shealy
10W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Lisa Harper
7W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
D Hendry
3W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.15
Robin Greco
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
Suzanne Swinson
14W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Mary Caggiano
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Susan Reese
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Norma Robinson
14W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Edith Padgett
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Beverly Long
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Catherine Miller
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Janis Johnson
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Trull
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Risa Clawson
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shirley Roberts
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.