Teams

Landings - Libbe

2025 SATA USTA Adult 65 & Over (Women) - Spring · Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-16vs SATA/Leigh Givens-UlmerLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Libbe / Colette Nichols vs Claire ODonnell / Leigh Givens-Ulmer0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Ihnat / Patricia Schminke vs Barbara Capes / Liz Hagen6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Anderson / Jan Bishop vs Jodi Holmes / Betsey Andersen3-6, 3-6
2025-04-09vs CRC - HarrisWon 21
L#1 DoublesCynthia Winski / Patricia Schminke vs Regina Graham / Monique Belli2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Ihnat / Katie Libbe vs Loretta Bridgeforth / Laura Barrett6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Anderson / Sally Minis vs Bonnie Dixon / Paula Parrish6-4, 7-5
2025-03-26vs SCC - PadgettWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarianne Cleary / Katie Libbe vs Risa Clawson / Lisa Harper6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCynthia Winski / Leslie Shields vs Linda Trull / Suzanne Swinson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesConstance Bertkau / Susan Anderson vs Beverly Long / Susan Reese6-0, 6-3
2025-03-19vs SATA/Judith BuxbaumWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarianne Cleary / Patricia Schminke vs Wendy Schroeder / Diane Harwell7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathy Ihnat / Colette Nichols vs Julie van Pelt / Kathy Wilson6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSally Minis / Jan Bishop vs Charlotte Lord / Gayle Curtiss6-7, 5-7
2025-03-12vs SATA/Leigh Givens-UlmerLost 12
L#1 DoublesConstance Bertkau / Marianne Cleary vs Barbara Capes / Sally Gleeson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLeslie Shields / Cynthia Winski vs Grace Cause / Jodi Holmes6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatie Libbe / Colette Nichols vs Judith Mella / Laurie Puccini6-3, 6-4
2025-03-11vs CRC - HarrisLost 03
L#1 DoublesColette Nichols / Patricia Schminke vs Regina Graham / Loretta Bridgeforth7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Anderson / Kathy Ihnat vs Mary Jo Hogan / Debbie Harris2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKatie Libbe / Debbie Giordan vs Bonnie Dixon / Janee Przybyl6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2025-02-25vs SCC - PadgettWon 21
L#1 DoublesColette Nichols / Marianne Cleary vs D Hendry / Virginia Shealy1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLeslie Shields / Susan Anderson vs Lisa Harper / Janis Johnson6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesConstance Bertkau / Debbie Giordan vs Catherine Miller / Caroline Hopkins6-1, 6-0
2025-02-12vs SATA/Judith BuxbaumLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Anderson / Kathy Ihnat vs Wendy Schroeder / Kathy Wilson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLeslie Shields / Cynthia Winski vs Linda David / Susan Johnson6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSally Minis / Debbie Giordan vs Ann Grant / Charlotte Lord3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Cynthia Winski
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Marianne Cleary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Constance Bertkau
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Patricia Schminke
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.99
Jan Bishop
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Debbie Giordan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Leslie Shields
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Kathy Ihnat
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.89
Colette Nichols
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.71
Carla Blumenthal
published 3
Katie Libbe
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Sally Minis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Shields + Cynthia Winski3256% gamesnot enough data
Marianne Cleary + Patricia Schminke123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cynthia Winski
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Marianne Cleary
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Constance Bertkau
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Patricia Schminke
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
Jan Bishop
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
3.5
Debbie Giordan
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Leslie Shields
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Kathy Ihnat
2W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.92
3
Colette Nichols
4W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.89
3
Carla Blumenthal
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Katie Libbe
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sally Minis
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.