Teams

Village Walk Bonita - MacWilliams

2022 Collier Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-11vs Naples Grande - LoomisLost 01
L#2 DoublesLeslie Prinz / Claire Ehrhardt vs Marlea Bowser / Leticia Lancsarics3-6, 0-6
2022-05-04vs Marco YMCA - WashakLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristine Bergenheim / Katherine MacWilliams vs Cheryl Solimine / Bridget Smagala2-6, 2-6
2022-04-27vs Quail West - VanderhorstLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristine Bergenheim / Connie Mosbaugh vs Mary Huber-Olk / Marie Zinno1-6, 2-6
2022-04-13vs Longshore Lake - KriekSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristine Bergenheim / Katherine MacWilliams vs Darlene Carpenter / Nancy Kriek6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesConnie Mosbaugh / Claire Ehrhardt vs Patty McClimans / Hilda Champion3-6, 3-6
2022-04-06vs Marco YMCA - BurschSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristine Bergenheim / Katherine MacWilliams vs Renee Facciola / Shirley Steffen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeslie Prinz / Claire Ehrhardt vs Susan Julich / Suzanne Messere6-7, 3-6
2022-03-30vs COLLIER - Quail Creek - J. BrownWon 10
W#3 DoublesClaire Ehrhardt / Kristine Bergenheim vs Sherry Burns / Maristela Battilana3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-23vs Heritage Bay - BeaudetSplit 11
L#1 DoublesClaire Ehrhardt / Leslie Prinz vs Julie Lenhart / Sharon Sturges2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKristine Bergenheim / Ellen Hermannsson vs Kristy Hartfield / Cheryl Rauch6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
3.30
Ann Kremer
published 3.5
3.19
Kristine Bergenheim
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.19
Margaret Laggis
published
3.18
Marcia Erpenbeck
published
3.17
Ellen Hermannsson
published 3.5
3.02
Leslie Prinz
published
2.74
Claire Ehrhardt
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Joan Ravens
published
Marketa Dieckmann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Ravens + Ann Kremer2349% gamesnot enough data
Claire Ehrhardt + Kristine Bergenheim3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine MacWilliams
32W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Ann Kremer
9W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Kristine Bergenheim
38W–52L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Margaret Laggis
20W–16L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
Marcia Erpenbeck
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Ellen Hermannsson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Leslie Prinz
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Claire Ehrhardt
18W–41L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Joan Ravens
12W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marketa Dieckmann
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.