Teams

Quail West - Vanderhorst

2022 Collier Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-18vs Marco YMCA - BurschSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Doreen Clappin vs Renee Facciola / Dana Sacks6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeslie Boris / Lisa Dailey vs Shirley Steffen / Susan Julich6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-05-11vs Fiddlers Creek - FioreWon 20
W#1 DoublesColleen Bresson / Marie Zinno vs Dawn Cooper / Shawn Fiore6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJane Mills vs Christine Demer6-1, 6-3
2022-05-04vs Heritage Bay - BeaudetLost 01
L#1 DoublesDoreen Clappin / Natalie Cortese vs Julie Lenhart / Sharon Sturges2-6, 4-6
2022-04-28vs Marco YMCA - WashakSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Soraya Nichols vs Jacqui ONeal Privitere / Alicia Rosa3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Dailey / Jane Mills vs Lori Ceryak / Connie Johnson6-3, 6-4
2022-04-27vs Village Walk Bonita - MacWilliamsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Marie Zinno vs Kristine Bergenheim / Connie Mosbaugh6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesShirley Yagoda / Lisa Dailey vs Ann Kremer / Joan Ravens6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-04-20vs COLLIER - Quail Creek - J. BrownSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarie Zinno / Colleen Bresson vs Aimee Hummel / Debra Blinstrub6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJane Mills vs Chrissy Rogers1-6, 1-6
2022-04-06vs Verona Walk - LeeWon 21
W#1 DoublesColleen Bresson / Marie Zinno vs Jan Kolesar / Debra O'Donnell2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJane Mills vs Cecilia Trinh1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNatalie Cortese / Doreen Clappin vs Cheryl Planck / Evelyn Mckoan6-2, 6-1
2022-03-30vs Naples Grande - LoomisLost 02
L#1 DoublesDoreen Clappin / Marie Zinno vs Susan Crum / Katie Lober6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJane Mills vs Marlea Bowser2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-03-23vs Longshore Lake - KriekWon 10
W#1 DoublesColleen Bresson / Marie Zinno vs Darlene Carpenter / Barbara Frank6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Melissa Bailey
published
3.63
Mary Huber-Olk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Natalie Cortese
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Marie Zinno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Doreen Clappin
published 3.5
3.38
Colleen Bresson
published 3.5
3.33
Michelle Minor
published
3.19
Leslie Boris
published
3.18
Jane Mills
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.10
Pam Davis
published
3.08
Dawn Strang
published 3.5
3.08
Rejeanne Desrosiers
published
3.08
Lisa Dailey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Kim Swope Schott
published
3.04
Soraya Nichols
published
2.90
Shirley Yagoda
published 3
Lauren Silbar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Huber-Olk + Colleen Bresson11363% games+8.5% vs expected
Michelle Minor + Doreen Clappin4356% games−1.0% vs expected
Kim Swope Schott + Marie Zinno6648% gamesnot enough data
Marie Zinno + Michelle Minor314 matchesnot enough data
Kim Swope Schott + Mary Huber-Olk213 matchesnot enough data
Jane Mills + Marie Zinno213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Bailey
14W–17L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Mary Huber-Olk
127W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Natalie Cortese
144W–71L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.52
Marie Zinno
66W–37L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Doreen Clappin
59W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Colleen Bresson
15W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
Michelle Minor
19W–16L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Leslie Boris
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Jane Mills
105W–100L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Pam Davis
2W–20L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Dawn Strang
29W–22L career · type A · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Rejeanne Desrosiers
43W–54L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Lisa Dailey
66W–71L career · 3 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Kim Swope Schott
23W–28L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
Soraya Nichols
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Shirley Yagoda
155W–105L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
2.90
Lauren Silbar
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.