Teams

Fiddlers Creek - Fiore

2022 Collier Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-18Lost 01
L#1 SinglesChristine Demer vs Meghan Kellam6-7, 1-6
2022-05-11vs Quail West - VanderhorstLost 02
L#1 DoublesDawn Cooper / Shawn Fiore vs Colleen Bresson / Marie Zinno1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesChristine Demer vs Jane Mills1-6, 3-6
2022-05-04vs Marco YMCA - BurschLost 02
L#1 SinglesMichelle Trapani vs Ana Cecilia Isaza0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLaura Fischer / Christine Demer vs Shirley Steffen / Susan Julich3-6, 0-6
2022-04-27vs Heritage Bay - BeaudetWon 20
W#1 SinglesMichelle Trapani vs Tiffany Moncrieff3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShawn Fiore / Cathlin Thompson vs Victoria Pollock / Mary O'Neil6-4, 6-3
2022-04-20vs Village Walk Bonita - MacWilliamsLost 01
L#1 DoublesDawn Cooper / Shawn Fiore vs Marcia Erpenbeck / Katherine MacWilliams1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-04-13vs Naples Grande - LoomisLost 01
L#1 SinglesChristine Demer vs Rosemary Rolak2-6, 1-6
2022-04-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesChristine Demer vs Maryann Kriger6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-03-30vs Verona Walk - LeeWon 10
W#3 DoublesKim Bernth / Christine Demer vs Debra O'Donnell / Cheryl Planck6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-03-23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa LaSpina Bonevento / Michelle Trapani vs Marie Veintimilla / Nikki Miller6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Claudia Bricknell
published 3.5
3.23
Christine Demer
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.22
Michelle Trapani
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Dawn Cooper
published 3.5
3.17
Jennifer Bauer
published
3.00
Cathlin Thompson
published 3.5
2.94
Ulla Wolff
published
Shawn Fiore
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa LaSpina Bonevento
13W–36L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Claudia Bricknell
9W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Christine Demer
29W–59L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Michelle Trapani
39W–29L career · 6 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Dawn Cooper
15W–20L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
Jennifer Bauer
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Cathlin Thompson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
Ulla Wolff
16W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
Shawn Fiore
25W–71L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.