Teams

Verona Walk - Lee

2022 Collier Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-18vs Village Walk Bonita - MacWilliamsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeanette Thevening / Elaine Leffingwell-King vs Marcia Erpenbeck / Katherine MacWilliams6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCecilia Trinh vs Marketa Dieckmann6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-11vs COLLIER - Quail Creek - J. BrownLost 01
L#2 DoublesCecilia Trinh / Cheryl Planck vs Jennifer Brown / Benita Brown6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-05-04vs Longshore Lake - KriekWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeanette Thevening / Elaine Leffingwell-King vs SUE BECK / Gail Wille6-3, 6-4
2022-04-27vs Marco YMCA - BurschSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCecilia Trinh vs Ana Cecilia Isaza6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDebra O'Donnell / Jeanette Thevening vs Ricki Giersch / Dana Sacks3-6, 5-7
2022-04-20vs Naples Grande - LoomisLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeanette Thevening / Patrice Clapacs vs Aggie Rupert / Michelle Bammel3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCecilia Trinh vs Marlea Bowser4-6, 5-7
2022-04-13vs Heritage Bay - BeaudetWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeanette Thevening / Debra O'Donnell vs Deborah Brisebois / Victoria Pollock7-5, 6-1
2022-04-06vs Quail West - VanderhorstWon 10
W#1 SinglesCecilia Trinh vs Jane Mills6-1, 6-4
2022-03-30vs Fiddlers Creek - FioreWon 20
W#1 SinglesCecilia Trinh vs Lisa Friedman6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesPatrice Clapacs / Jeanette Thevening vs Claudia Bricknell / Cathlin Thompson7-5, 6-4
2022-03-23vs Marco YMCA - WashakSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCecilia Trinh vs Inge Lund6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJeanette Thevening / Cheryl Planck vs Lori Ceryak / Andrea Washak3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Cecilia Trinh
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.30
Jeanette Thevening
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.29
Jan Kolesar
published
3.23
Lisa Sackett
published
3.19
Cheryl Planck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan Kolesar + Lisa Sackett262355% games−2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cecilia Trinh
94W–102L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Jeanette Thevening
144W–70L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Jan Kolesar
140W–68L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Lisa Sackett
118W–92L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Elaine Leffingwell-King
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
Cheryl Planck
22W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.