Teams

Brace Yourselves

2025 USTA MIXED 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

12 players · average NTRP 3.95 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-10vs Bringin' the RacketLost 01
L#1 DoublesCourtney Sticka / Wade Wagner vs Maji Daines / Roman Davis3-6, 2-6
2025-03-09vs HomelessWon 10
W#1 DoublesWade Wagner / Emily Smith vs Emily Thomas / Troy Casper3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-03-01vs Guess Who's BackWon 10
W#1 DoublesCourtney Sticka / Wade Wagner vs Karen East / Tayler Henrie6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Jacob Roberts
published 4
4.04
Gregory Johnson
published 4.5
3.94
Mary Katayama
published 4
3.82
Justin Armstrong
published 4
3.78
Brent Bradburn
published 4
3.72
Courtney Sticka
published 4
3.70
3.64
Lexi Bruneel
published 4
3.64
JAYDIP GUHA
published 4
3.37
Tiffany Roberts
published 3.5
3.35
Vanessa Schulte
published 3.5
Wade Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brent Bradburn + Courtney Sticka9555% games+10.8% vs expected
Jacob Roberts + Tiffany Roberts11163% games+7.4% vs expected
Brette Shakespeare + Justin Armstrong3254% games+4.2% vs expected
Courtney Sticka + Wade Wagner8656% gamesnot enough data
Brent Bradburn + Lexi Bruneel314 matchesnot enough data
Courtney Sticka + Justin Armstrong314 matchesnot enough data
Wade Wagner + Vanessa Schulte224 matchesnot enough data
Tiffany Roberts + Gregory Johnson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jacob Roberts
91W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
4.09
4.5
Gregory Johnson
36W–45L career · type M · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
4.04
4
Mary Katayama
82W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Justin Armstrong
43W–35L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Brent Bradburn
135W–99L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Courtney Sticka
85W–69L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
4
Brette Shakespeare
77W–72L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Lexi Bruneel
26W–31L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
JAYDIP GUHA
151W–106L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Tiffany Roberts
59W–43L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Vanessa Schulte
106W–97L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Wade Wagner
29W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.