Teams

Southern: Break Point Tennis - 1

2023 18&Over Women · 2.5

14 players · average NTRP 2.95 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-17vs Cross CourtWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlex Etsuko Rosenblum / Andrea Mondello vs Eileen Kaisik / Sharon Fleury6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCallan Young vs Karina Heffron3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGabrielle Melton / Marianne Hawryluk vs Gladys Escalante / Emily Goodman7-5, 6-0
2023-06-26vs Taconic Sport and Racquet:RandWon 20
W#1 DoublesPeggy Gertner / Kristin Jutton vs Georgene Bryce / Maria Kurshan6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlex Etsuko Rosenblum / Gabrielle Melton vs Elizabeth Flynn-Rand / Lisa Mazochi7-5, 7-6
2023-06-19vs Break Point Tennis - ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesIsabel Vinton / Caitlin Sanzi vs Patty Gandin / Lachele Coninx-Wiley1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlex Etsuko Rosenblum / Marianne Hawryluk vs Rebecca Vogel / Michelle Crafton6-2, 6-1
2023-06-12vs Taconic: Spafford/MilholmWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Jutton / Caitlin Sanzi vs Susan Kraus / Alicia Lore6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesPeggy Gertner vs Krista Fragos6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Mondello / Marianne Hawryluk vs Kathleen Vogt / Michelle Azukas6-3, 6-2
2023-06-05vs Cross CourtWon 30
W#1 DoublesIsabel Vinton / Caitlin Sanzi vs Sharon Fleury / Gladys Escalante6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesErin Heyns vs Alicia Estes6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCallan Young / Amy Thompson vs Leslee Bowman / Ida Parise6-1, 6-3
2023-05-15vs Taconic Sport and Racquet:RandWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Snyder / Gabrielle Melton vs Cheryl Taylor / Louise Bald7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesIsabel Vinton vs Lisette Aller6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Jutton / Eva Lopez-Salinero vs Irene Benvenuto / Elizabeth Flynn-Rand6-4, 6-1
2023-05-08vs Break Point Tennis - AWon 30
W#1 DoublesPeggy Gertner / Marianne Hawryluk vs Patty Gandin / Joanne Arcadipane6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesGabrielle Melton vs Beka Goedde6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCallan Young / Lauren Rich vs Tamar Adler / Michelle Crafton6-1, 6-1
2023-05-01vs Taconic: Spafford/MilholmWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristin Jutton / Eva Lopez-Salinero vs Karlee Kussel / Alicia Lore6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGabrielle Melton / Andrea Mondello vs Lorraine McMorrow / Michelle Azukas6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Southern: Break Point Tennis - 1082224105
2Taconic Sport and Racquet:Rand08121226210
3Taconic: Spafford/Milholm0842041261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Callan Young
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Gabrielle Melton
usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #3 Doubles 15% · published 3
Amy Thompson
published 3
Erin Heyns
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Eva Lopez-Salinero
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Isabel Vinton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.54
Andrea Mondello
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Alex Etsuko Rosenblum
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Lauren Rich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Alivia Messina
published 2.5
Caitlin Sanzi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Kristin Jutton
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Marianne Hawryluk
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Peggy Gertner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabrielle Melton + Callan Young314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Callan Young
22W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
3
Gabrielle Melton
20W–21L career · 13 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Amy Thompson
no matches on record · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Erin Heyns
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3
Eva Lopez-Salinero
13W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Isabel Vinton
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Andrea Mondello
23W–48L career · 9 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Alex Etsuko Rosenblum
11W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
Lauren Rich
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2023
0%49%51%
2.50
2.5
Alivia Messina
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Caitlin Sanzi
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristin Jutton
12W–0L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marianne Hawryluk
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Peggy Gertner
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.