Teams

Taconic Sport and Racquet:Rand

2023 18&Over Women · 2.5

11 players · average NTRP / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-17vs Taconic: Spafford/MilholmWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Flynn-Rand / Cheryl Taylor vs Jody Milholm / Heather Ostman6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesHailey Petrini vs Kathleen Vogt2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIrene Benvenuto / Lisa Mazochi vs Susan Kraus / Lois Petrone6-4, 6-1
2023-07-10vs Cross CourtWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Flynn-Rand / Cheryl Taylor vs Leslee Bowman / Sharon Fleury6-0, 7-5
W#1 SinglesEmma Arnoff vs Alicia Estes6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaurie Hutchison / Lisa Mazochi vs Emily Goodman / Gladys Escalante4-6, 4-6
2023-06-26vs Southern: Break Point Tennis - 1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesGeorgene Bryce / Maria Kurshan vs Peggy Gertner / Kristin Jutton1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHailey Petrini vs Amy Thompson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Flynn-Rand / Lisa Mazochi vs Alex Etsuko Rosenblum / Gabrielle Melton5-7, 6-7
2023-06-12vs Break Point Tennis - ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesLouise Bald / Laurie Hutchison vs Lachele Coninx-Wiley / Patty Gandin6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Flynn-Rand / Lisa Mazochi vs Katy Weber / Joanne Arcadipane1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-06-05vs Taconic: Spafford/MilholmWon 30
W#1 DoublesLouise Bald / Laurie Hutchison vs Vicky Hayashida / Karlee Kussel6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesIrene Benvenuto vs Lois Petrone6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGeorgene Bryce / Maria Kurshan vs Sarah Duch / Lorraine McMorrow6-3, 6-4
2023-05-22vs Cross CourtWon 21
W#1 DoublesGeorgene Bryce / Irene Benvenuto vs Alicia Estes / Emily Goodman7-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesEmma Arnoff vs Karina Heffron2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLouise Bald / Cheryl Taylor vs Ida Parise / Gale Zadoff6-2, 6-2
2023-05-15vs Southern: Break Point Tennis - 1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCheryl Taylor / Louise Bald vs Linda Snyder / Gabrielle Melton6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLisette Aller vs Isabel Vinton0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesIrene Benvenuto / Elizabeth Flynn-Rand vs Kristin Jutton / Eva Lopez-Salinero4-6, 1-6
2023-05-01vs Break Point Tennis - ALost 03
L#1 DoublesMaria Kurshan / Georgene Bryce vs Patty Gandin / Stephanie Bassler4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesHailey Petrini vs Rebecca Vogel1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Flynn-Rand / Nancy Murphy vs Lachele Coninx-Wiley / Katy Weber2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Southern: Break Point Tennis - 1082224105
2Taconic Sport and Racquet:Rand08121226210
3Taconic: Spafford/Milholm0842041261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Louise Bald
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.63
Irene Benvenuto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.44
Lisa Mazochi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Laurie Hutchison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.35
Lisette Aller
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.32
Elizabeth Flynn-Rand
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.10
Maria Kurshan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Emma Arnoff
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Francyne Craig
published
Georgene Bryce
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Hailey Petrini
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Irene Benvenuto + Lisa Mazochi8357% games+8.4% vs expected
Laurie Hutchison + Louise Bald2348% games+2.1% vs expected
Laurie Hutchison + Lisa Mazochi3258% games+0.3% vs expected
Lisa Mazochi + Elizabeth Flynn-Rand3254% gamesnot enough data
Maria Kurshan + Georgene Bryce224 matchesnot enough data
Irene Benvenuto + Elizabeth Flynn-Rand134 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Hutchison + Elizabeth Flynn-Rand224 matchesnot enough data
Louise Bald + Elizabeth Flynn-Rand134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Louise Bald
8W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%10%90%
2.68
Irene Benvenuto
29W–25L career · 4 lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
2.63
Lisa Mazochi
19W–18L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%68%32%
2.44
Laurie Hutchison
19W–27L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%83%17%
2.37
Lisette Aller
14W–17L career · 1 line in 2023
0%86%14%
2.35
Elizabeth Flynn-Rand
24W–26L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%90%10%
2.32
Maria Kurshan
10W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Emma Arnoff
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Francyne Craig
0W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Georgene Bryce
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Hailey Petrini
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.