Teams

Team Maximus

ADULT 18 & Over · 3.5 MEN

4 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-28vs Team ResendezSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMatt Jones / Max Ogas vs John Ruddell / Christopher Thomasson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTim Stephens / Matt Wood vs Taylor Gehring / Wes Livesay1-6, 3-6
2026-04-14vs Team ResendezSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMax Ogas / Matt Jones vs Eliseo Resendez / John Ruddell4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTim Stephens / Nathan Navarro vs Robert Scheibler / Ravi Sriram1-6, 2-6
2026-04-07vs Team ResendezWon 10
W#2 DoublesMatt Jones / Max Ogas vs Nathan Gibbs / Wes Livesay6-4, 6-4
2026-03-31vs Team ResendezLost 02
L#2 DoublesDavid Melvin / Tim Stephens vs Eliseo Resendez / John Ruddell6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMatt Jones / Max Ogas vs Charlie Burgess / NATHAN GAINES4-6, 4-6
2026-03-26vs Team ResendezWon 20
W#2 DoublesTim Stephens / David Melvin vs Robert Scheibler / Ravi Sriram7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMax Ogas vs Tom Sullivan5-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team Resendez42161432260
2Team Maximus24141637299

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Max Ogas
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.02
Tim Stephens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
John Fisher
published
Matt Wood
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Max Ogas
16W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Tim Stephens
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.02
John Fisher
17W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Matt Wood
6W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.