Teams

Team Resendez

ADULT 18 & Over · 3.5 MEN

4 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-28vs Team MaximusWon 30
W#1 DoublesRavi Sriram / Robert Scheibler vs Craig McGehee / David Melvin6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesEliseo Resendez vs Jared Johnson6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTaylor Gehring / Wes Livesay vs Tim Stephens / Matt Wood6-1, 6-3
2026-04-14vs Team MaximusLost 12
L#1 DoublesCharlie Burgess / NATHAN GAINES vs Craig McGehee / John Fisher6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesEliseo Resendez / John Ruddell vs Max Ogas / Matt Jones6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRobert Scheibler / Ravi Sriram vs Tim Stephens / Nathan Navarro6-1, 6-2
2026-04-07vs Team MaximusLost 03
L#1 DoublesTaylor Gehring / Ravi Sriram vs David Melvin / Craig McGehee2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEliseo Resendez vs Jared Johnson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNathan Gibbs / Wes Livesay vs Matt Jones / Max Ogas4-6, 4-6
2026-03-31vs Team MaximusWon 31
W#1 DoublesRobert Scheibler / Ravi Sriram vs Craig McGehee / Sambhav Jain7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesEliseo Resendez / John Ruddell vs David Melvin / Tim Stephens4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesWes Livesay vs John Fisher4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCharlie Burgess / NATHAN GAINES vs Matt Jones / Max Ogas6-4, 6-4
2026-03-26vs Team MaximusWon 21
W#1 DoublesCharlie Burgess / NATHAN GAINES vs Sambhav Jain / Matt Wood6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesEliseo Resendez vs Craig McGehee4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Scheibler / Ravi Sriram vs Tim Stephens / David Melvin5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-17Won 31
W#1 DoublesRavi Sriram / Robert Scheibler vs Nathan Navarro / Bary Gould6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesWes Livesay / Christopher Thomasson vs Matt Jones / David Melvin2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesEliseo Resendez vs Craig McGehee4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCharlie Burgess / NATHAN GAINES vs Sambhav Jain / Matt Wood6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team Resendez42161432260
2Team Maximus24141637299

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Ravi Sriram
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.34
NATHAN GAINES
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Wes Livesay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.15
Eliseo Resendez
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ravi Sriram
63W–49L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
NATHAN GAINES
13W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Wes Livesay
7W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Eliseo Resendez
25W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.