Teams

UPTA39FF/Auger/ButlerSprings

2025 Fun Fall 39 & over - GTL · 3.5 Women FF

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-03vs UPTA39FF/Gunderson/PavilionWon 50
W#1 DoublesJeannie Roberts / Laura McNeel vs Kathryn Means / Catherine Boetsch6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAustin Clay vs Emily Allen6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNaomi Kozawa / Julie Branham vs Laura Fee / Elizabeth Raduns7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBessie Gonzalez / Sharon Payne vs Patricia Surles / Misela Garcia7-6, 7-6
W#4 DoublesJennifer Nessmith / Jill Curran vs Dorelly Herford / Ashley Brown6-4, 6-4
2025-10-13vs UPTA39FF/Hughes/KrocSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJeannie Roberts / Naomi Kozawa vs Kim Tyler / Tricia Socash6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJanielle Redmond vs Ann Ashmore0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Payne / Jennifer Nessmith vs Jeanna Chambers / Brooke Miller3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#4 DoublesLisa Auger / Austin Clay vs Missy Lawlor / Martha Gower6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Austin Clay
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.41
Julie Branham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Jeannie Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Naomi Kozawa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Laura McNeel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Natilee Falk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Bessie Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Sharon Payne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Lisa Auger
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Jennifer Nessmith
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Janet Collins
published
2.77
Susan Tankersley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Janielle Redmond
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura McNeel + Susan Tankersley4257% games+4.3% vs expected
Laura McNeel + Jeannie Roberts91049% games−4.4% vs expected
Lisa Auger + Austin Clay4351% games−5.5% vs expected
Jennifer Nessmith + Susan Tankersley1447% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Payne + Jennifer Nessmith224 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Payne + Austin Clay224 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Payne + Susan Tankersley134 matchesnot enough data
Naomi Kozawa + Jeannie Roberts314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Austin Clay
27W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Julie Branham
51W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Jeannie Roberts
33W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
Naomi Kozawa
38W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
Laura McNeel
38W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Natilee Falk
22W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Bessie Gonzalez
13W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Sharon Payne
17W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.14
Lisa Auger
13W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
Jennifer Nessmith
21W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Janet Collins
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
Susan Tankersley
16W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Janielle Redmond
4W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.