Teams

Bailey/Bentonville/IND

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-08vs Vargo-Lasater/Rogers/SVCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesVijay Manoharan / Stuart Weaver vs Austin Lasater / Hayes Shimp4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSTEFANO ROSSO / Dan Twiss vs Nicolas Mejia / Deric Neal5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristopher Howard / Sanjeev Vanam vs Nicholaa Colucci / Tr Rose2-6, 1-6
2026-08-06vs Smith-Cockrell/Rogers/MRCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Hendricks / Robby Herbert vs Jared Culbert / Graham Gudis4-6, 1-3
W#2 DoublesVijay Manoharan / Luke Neja vs Drew Smith / Steven Smith6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSanjeev Vanam / Christopher Howard vs Grant Patterson / Matthew Hanafin6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-07-20vs Valiveti/Centerton/KTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark Hendricks / Robby Herbert vs SIVA SANKAR BACHANABOYANA / Shashikanth Divakaruni6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPeter Bailey / Luke Neja vs Bala Kota Bhaskara Rao Jagabattula / Rishabh Arora2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesChristopher Howard / Brandon Morrison vs Alex Buckley / Gautam Guntur6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Tihomir Buncic
published
3.72
Mark Hendricks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Robby Herbert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Vijay Manoharan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Luke Neja
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Dan Twiss
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
STEFANO ROSSO
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Christopher Howard
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.83
Brandon Morrison
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.53
Sanjeev Vanam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stuart Weaver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robby Herbert + Mark Hendricks123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tihomir Buncic
14W–15L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
Mark Hendricks
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.72
Robby Herbert
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
Vijay Manoharan
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Luke Neja
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Dan Twiss
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
STEFANO ROSSO
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Christopher Howard
10W–3L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.98
3
Brandon Morrison
10W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Sanjeev Vanam
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
Stuart Weaver
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.