← Search

Mark Hendricks

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
178 matches · 102W–76L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history178 matches
L
2026-10-21 · Abdin/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Clay Galloway
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-10-20 · Abdin/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Best
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-10 · Carter/Rogers/KTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Best
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-06 · Bailey/Bentonville/IND · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robby Herbert
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-3
L
2026-07-26 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Buffy Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · Bailey/Bentonville/IND · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robby Herbert
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-12 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Faith Hendricks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Buffy Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-31 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Faith Hendricks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-11 · Bachman-Jones/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deric Neal
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-07 · Heien-Short/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stan Rodgers
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-01 · Heien-Short/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackson Cervantes
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
100%
15W–0L · 75.7% of games
3.25
33.3%
2W–4L · 38.4% of games
3.5
61.1%
22W–14L · 51.4% of games
4.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 50.7% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 54.6% of games
7.5
37.5%
9W–15L · 47.8% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 57.5% of games
4.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 42.4% of games
6.0mixed
75%
18W–6L · 63.4% of games
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
36 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova