Teams

A40 4.0M CRC Budgen

2024 NEOTA Adult 40 & Over · NEOTA A40&O 4.0 Men

19 players · average NTRP 3.64 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-18vs OH NEO A40 4.0M PlymakLost 03
L#1 DoublesPhillip Michalos / Dave Wolf vs Doug Ott / Kevin Poor1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Gurary / Leonard Kichler vs Sundar Arumugam / Arvind Gounder2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Sullivan / Alan Hochheiser vs John Plymak / David Rickard6-7, 5-7
2024-07-11vs A40 4.0M WR KrennLost 04
L#1 SinglesBill Babcox vs Timothy Krenn0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Sullivan / Dave Wolf vs Ryan Hannan / Eric van Airsdale3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSergio Thal / Leonard Kichler vs Dennis Matecun / Charles Manak2-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesJim Bright / Alan Hochheiser vs Dan Johnson / Doug Sachtleben2-6, 2-6
2024-06-27vs A40 4.0M MV1 ColeLost 13
L#1 DoublesLeonard Kichler / Leonard Pagon vs Joseph Stimac / Leonid Zelikman4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Gurary / John Sullivan vs Hyundong Cho / Seth Vilensky2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDave Wolf / Sergio Thal vs David Cole / Krishna Neelakanta2-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesAlan Hochheiser / Jim Bright vs Garnett Meador / Robert Haught7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2024-06-20vs A40 4.0M AO WissmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesSergio Thal / David Gurary vs Andreas Spintzyk / Brian Padden0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDave Wolf vs Barry Hubbard0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Henry / Phillip Michalos vs GEORGE Szeltner / Sean Nichols2-6, 0-6
2024-06-13vs A40 4.0M MM BurnoskiLost 03
L#1 DoublesSergio Thal / John Sullivan vs Louis Burnoski / Will Schultz0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDave Wolf vs Chris Reutepohler1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesWilliam Henry / Alan Hochheiser vs John Scofield / Robert Farrell1-6, 2-6
2024-06-06vs A40 4.0M WE RiesLost 04
L#1 DoublesSergio Thal / Leonard Kichler vs Sonny Kwon / Ken Webster3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesLeonard Pagon vs Tyler Davidson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Gurary / Dave Wolf vs Mark Weiskind / Seth Unger3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAlan Hochheiser / Andrew Margolius vs James Pruce / Peter Frankfort3-6, 3-6
2024-05-30vs OH NEO A40 4.0M TyrpakLost 05
L#1 DoublesJames Davin / Sergio Thal vs Ben Purdy / Trent Binger1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMatt Winograd vs Christopher Bolinger4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMitch Weisman / William Henry vs Theodore Palace / Daniel Tyrpak0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLeonard Kichler / Dan Selle vs Matt Hutchison / Christopher Johnson2-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesJim Bright / Alan Hochheiser vs Milan Dayalal / Amish Yajnik1-6, 2-6
2024-05-16vs OH NEO A40 4.0M SmithLost 04
L#1 DoublesSergio Thal / Leonard Kichler vs Phong Nguyen / Timothy Jones3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesDave Wolf vs Motoo Saito7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJim Bright / Mitch Weisman vs Akin Fashina / Adam Atwell1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJames Davin / Tom Palenschat vs Eric Mock / Gerald King1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · NEOTA A40&O 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OH NEO A40 4.0M Smith9041417300
2OH NEO A40 4.0M Tyrpak81351026307
3OH NEO A40 4.0M Plymak63271842383
4A40 4.0M MM Burnoski54242146366
5A40 4.0M AO Wissman54232250386
6A40 4.0M NC Otto45242148384
7A40 4.0M WR Krenn45192658422
8A40 4.0M WE Ries36182757429
9A40 4.0M MV1 Cole18133270473
10A40 4.0M CRC Budgen0914489543

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bill Babcox
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
James Davin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Leonard Pagon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.50
Jim Bright
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Marc Estafanous
published
3.37
David Gurary
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Dave Wolf
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.15
Dan Selle
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Sergio Thal
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.12
Andrew Margolius
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Leonard Kichler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Alan Hochheiser
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Martin Cohen
published
Matt Winograd
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Mitch Weisman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Phillip Michalos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tom Palenschat
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
William Henry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
William Kimmerle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sergio Thal + Alan Hochheiser3643% games+5.0% vs expected
David Gurary + Sergio Thal5946% games+3.1% vs expected
Sergio Thal + Leonard Kichler61839% games−6.7% vs expected
William Henry + Phillip Michalos2940% games−7.1% vs expected
Jim Bright + Alan Hochheiser1634% games−9.5% vs expected
William Henry + Alan Hochheiser2738% gamesnot enough data
Leonard Kichler + Dan Selle1637% gamesnot enough data
Bill Babcox + Leonard Pagon4259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bill Babcox
8W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
James Davin
4W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Leonard Pagon
28W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.51
Jim Bright
8W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.50
Marc Estafanous
12W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%44%
3.48
3.5
David Gurary
17W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Dave Wolf
10W–38L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Dan Selle
42W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
Sergio Thal
27W–85L career · 7 lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Andrew Margolius
1W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
Leonard Kichler
20W–69L career · 6 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Alan Hochheiser
13W–49L career · 6 lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
2.97
Martin Cohen
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Matt Winograd
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Mitch Weisman
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Phillip Michalos
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tom Palenschat
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
William Henry
4W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
William Kimmerle
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.