Teams

OH NEO A40 4.0M Smith

2024 NEOTA Adult 40 & Over · NEOTA A40&O 4.0 Men

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-07-18vs A40 4.0M WR KrennWon 40
W#1 SinglesYing Lin vs Willard Greenwood6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAdam Atwell / Akin Fashina vs Robert Hoffman / Doug Sachtleben6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKeith Brady / Jinu Hwang vs Quinton Massey / David Terbeek7-5, 6-2
W#4 DoublesJim Batchik / Eric Mock vs Dan Johnson / Bernard Laryea6-1, 6-0
2024-07-11vs A40 4.0M MV1 ColeWon 31
L#1 DoublesAndrew Albrecht / Omar Baez Coronel vs Seth Vilensky / Ken Gustafson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChristopher Jarox vs Krishna Neelakanta6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAdam Atwell / Akin Fashina vs Bruce Bensimone / David Blond6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMotoo Saito / Jinu Hwang vs Hyundong Cho / Robert Haught6-2, 6-3
2024-06-27vs A40 4.0M AO WissmanWon 41
W#1 DoublesAndrew Albrecht / Timothy Jones vs Brian Padden / Jeffrey Wells6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesYing Lin vs Barry Hubbard7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAkin Fashina / Scott KITZMILLER vs GEORGE Szeltner / Sean Nichols6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFrank Mercuri / Keith Brady vs Matthew Horwich / Joseph Wissman6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#4 DoublesJim Batchik / Eric Mock vs John McGeehan / Dietrich Schelzig6-3, 6-4
2024-06-20vs A40 4.0M MM BurnoskiWon 50
W#1 DoublesAdam Atwell / Timothy Jones vs Louis Burnoski / Will Schultz6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDouglas Vahey vs Stephen DeBacco6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAndrew Albrecht / Jim Batchik vs James Nieves / Robert Farrell7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGerald King / Eric Mock vs Philip Canadas / Christopher Buford6-2, 6-1
W#4 DoublesKeith Brady / Scott KITZMILLER vs William Davis / Chris Reutepohler6-2, 6-1
2024-06-13vs A40 4.0M WE RiesWon 50
W#1 DoublesAdam Atwell / Akin Fashina vs Ken Webster / Sonny Kwon7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDouglas Vahey vs Tyler Davidson6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPhong Nguyen / Jim Batchik vs VLAD VOLKOV / Peter Frankfort6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMotoo Saito / Timothy Jones vs David Ries / Seth Unger7-5, 6-2
W#4 DoublesFrank Mercuri / Christopher Jarox vs Peruri Srinivasulu / Corey O'Brien6-1, 6-3
2024-06-06vs OH NEO A40 4.0M TyrpakWon 31
L#1 SinglesYing Lin vs Christopher Bolinger2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAdam Atwell / Akin Fashina vs Trent Binger / Theodore Palace6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAndrew Albrecht / Scott KITZMILLER vs Kevin Clinesmith / Timothy Perdion5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#4 DoublesGerald King / Eric Mock vs Mike Lee / Daniel Tyrpak7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-30vs A40 4.0M NC OttoWon 40
W#1 SinglesYing Lin vs Anson Gross6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAdam Atwell / Akin Fashina vs Michael Jackson / David Currier6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAndrew Albrecht / Scott KITZMILLER vs Kent Smith / Michael Rife6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesEric Mock / Gerald King vs Elmer McClave / Daren Rosenberger3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-05-23vs OH NEO A40 4.0M PlymakWon 50
W#1 DoublesAndrew Albrecht / Phong Nguyen vs David Limberg / Miguel Romero6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesYing Lin vs Richard Zsigray7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAdam Atwell / Keith Brady vs Arvind Gounder / Sundar Arumugam7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGerald King / Eric Mock vs Kevin Butler / Hazem Nouraldin6-3, 7-5
W#4 DoublesMotoo Saito / Jinu Hwang vs Doug Ott / John Plymak6-2, 6-3
2024-05-16vs A40 4.0M CRC BudgenWon 30
W#1 SinglesMotoo Saito vs Dave Wolf6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAkin Fashina / Adam Atwell vs Jim Bright / Mitch Weisman6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEric Mock / Gerald King vs James Davin / Tom Palenschat6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · NEOTA A40&O 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OH NEO A40 4.0M Smith9041417300
2OH NEO A40 4.0M Tyrpak81351026307
3OH NEO A40 4.0M Plymak63271842383
4A40 4.0M MM Burnoski54242146366
5A40 4.0M AO Wissman54232250386
6A40 4.0M NC Otto45242148384
7A40 4.0M WR Krenn45192658422
8A40 4.0M WE Ries36182757429
9A40 4.0M MV1 Cole18133270473
10A40 4.0M CRC Budgen0914489543

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Akin Fashina
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
4.08
Adam Atwell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.06
Ying Lin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.90
Jim Batchik
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.87
Gerald King
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.85
Motoo Saito
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.83
Andrew Albrecht
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Keith Brady
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.76
Douglas Vahey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Christopher Jarox
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Jinu Hwang
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Eric Mock
usually #4 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.51
Frank Mercuri
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Omar Baez Coronel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Scott KITZMILLER
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
Timothy Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Mock + Gerald King26364% games+8.7% vs expected
Adam Atwell + Akin Fashina7266% games+8.4% vs expected
Adam Atwell + Eric Mock8749% games+6.8% vs expected
Jim Batchik + Akin Fashina13264% games+6.6% vs expected
Jinu Hwang + Motoo Saito3255% games+4.0% vs expected
Frank Mercuri + Christopher Jarox1440% gamesnot enough data
Jim Batchik + Eric Mock4165% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Albrecht + Jim Batchik314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Akin Fashina
104W–34L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
4.10
4.5
Adam Atwell
80W–52L career · 8 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
4.08
Ying Lin
25W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.06
Jim Batchik
69W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.90
4
Gerald King
37W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.87
Motoo Saito
38W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Andrew Albrecht
85W–57L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
Keith Brady
45W–12L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Douglas Vahey
30W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Christopher Jarox
24W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jinu Hwang
82W–66L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Eric Mock
113W–101L career · 7 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Frank Mercuri
109W–135L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.51
Omar Baez Coronel
38W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.45
Scott KITZMILLER
120W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Timothy Jones
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.