Teams

LATA40/Newman/SSP

2025 Adult 40 & Over - USTA · Adult Men - 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-19vs LATA40/Sinegar/CAMPLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert French / Don Cope vs Chris Sinegar / Zack Robertson1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDerek Collum vs Mark Wild6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRandal Senn / Timothy Hewson vs Jim Wescott / Boone Walker2-6, 2-6
2025-02-26vs LATA40/Sinegar/CAMPSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRobert French / Timothy Hewson vs Ashley Chason / Randy Westerkam3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDerek Collum vs Joshua Estes6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRobert Aull / Scott Hanners vs Zack Robertson / Jenkins Mann6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#4 DoublesShay Martin / Don Cope vs Greg Prevost / MARTIN CATOLICO4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Craig Aull
published 4
Derek Collum
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.72
Robert Aull
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Robert French
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Don Cope
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Rolf Kiser
published 4
3.20
Randal Senn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Gardiner
published
Scott Hanners
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Newman
published
Shay Martin
published
Timothy Hewson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Aull + Robert French303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Craig Aull
14W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Derek Collum
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Aull
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Robert French
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Don Cope
5W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Rolf Kiser
70W–79L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
Randal Senn
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Mark Gardiner
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Hanners
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Scott Newman
12W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shay Martin
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Hewson
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.