Teams

GOLDMAN TC CW7.5A

2022 COMBO · Women 7.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-11-17vs MT TAM RC CW7.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesRia Mendoza / Laura Zhang vs Nicole Bianchi / Nina Trowbridge6-7, 4-6
2022-10-29vs ROLLING HILLS CW7.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesRia Mendoza / Laura Zhang vs Tricia Hulsey / Jonell Langley6-2, 6-2
2022-09-02vs MARIN TC CW7.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesRia Mendoza / Kathryn Benson vs Emily Birkenseer / Brenda Dorian0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adrienne Ladd
published 4
Angela Marks
published 4
3.62
Claudia Vlasak
published 4
3.51
Patti O'Kelly
published
3.50
Ria Mendoza
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.33
Martha Ehrenfeld
published
3.32
Karen Brandman
published
3.28
Theresia Treadway
published
Amy Niles
published 3.5
3.23
Janet Arnesty
published
3.12
Mary Anne Ruyle
published
3.03
Risa Meyer
published
2.99
Helen Y Chang
published 3.5
Karen Forsthoff
published
Lois Anne Indorf
published
Maimi Hom
published
Pearl Villena
published
Susan Vollmer
published
Vicky Perez
published
Vicky Simonds
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lois Anne Indorf + Karen Forsthoff123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adrienne Ladd
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Angela Marks
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Claudia Vlasak
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Patti O'Kelly
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
Ria Mendoza
72W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
Martha Ehrenfeld
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
3.33
Karen Brandman
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Theresia Treadway
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.28
3.5
Amy Niles
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Janet Arnesty
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
3.23
Mary Anne Ruyle
10W–17L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
Risa Meyer
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Helen Y Chang
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.99
Karen Forsthoff
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lois Anne Indorf
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maimi Hom
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pearl Villena
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Vollmer
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Vicky Perez
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Vicky Simonds
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.