Teams

Ivory Ridge-Meshkin

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.0W AM

8 players · average NTRP 3.90 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-01vs Liberty Park Tennis-Jones/MoretonLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Willes / DeeAnn Henderson vs Kimberly Holmstrom / Susan Knight7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2023-05-25vs Cottonwood Club-WarrenLost 01
L#2 SinglesLisa Willes vs Dorene Sambado2-6, 2-6
2023-05-11vs Sunpro-Blackhurst/MayberryLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Willes / Abigail Willes vs Tena Maughan / Karen Christensen2-6, 4-6
2023-04-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Willes / Abigail Willes vs Amy Johnson / Jessica Olsen3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-04-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Willes / Abigail Willes vs Regina Johnson / Robyn Scharman6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2023-04-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Willes / Abigail Willes vs Susan Knight / Carolee Romney4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Martha Brown
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.83
Kat Fuller
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.83
Trisha Cutrer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
DeeAnn Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.53
Janee Roper
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.29
Dena Porter
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Lisa Willes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Whitni Skousen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kat Fuller + Martha Brown12565% games+12.9% vs expected
Kat Fuller + Trisha Cutrer362357% games+12.6% vs expected
Kat Fuller + DeeAnn Henderson7167% games+10.5% vs expected
DeeAnn Henderson + Martha Brown12463% games+7.3% vs expected
DeeAnn Henderson + Trisha Cutrer4454% games+4.4% vs expected
Janee Roper + Trisha Cutrer8357% games+4.3% vs expected
Martha Brown + Trisha Cutrer25562% games+3.5% vs expected
Janee Roper + DeeAnn Henderson3355% games+3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Brown
196W–69L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%73%26%
3.91
4
Kat Fuller
131W–95L career · 11 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Trisha Cutrer
208W–112L career · 15 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
4
DeeAnn Henderson
290W–224L career · 14 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.55
4
Janee Roper
146W–123L career · type A · 16 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Dena Porter
51W–63L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Lisa Willes
58W–101L career · 6 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
Whitni Skousen
60W–38L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.