Teams

MVC Wassenaar FWL M40-8.0X

2024 WMI FWL USTA League Mixed 40&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI FWL M40&O 8.0 X (6 player)

7 players · average NTRP / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-10-01vs PA Podgurski FWL M40-8.0XWon 21
L#1 DoublesRolan Lusaya / Elizabeth Antor vs Steven Podgurski / Emi Mueller6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTed Diedrich / Marjori Cantwell vs Scott Bont / Debbie Buchan6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesGEORGE CHANG / Joan Hannadarrell vs Casey Tjalsma / Kathy Labozzetta7-5, 6-0
2023-09-17vs PA Podgurski FWL M40-8.0XWon 21
W#1 DoublesGEORGE CHANG / Joan Hannadarrell vs Scott Arlen / Tanya Gonzalez6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRolan Lusaya / Elizabeth Antor vs Kristen Snyder / Scott Bont6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJennie Wassenaar / Ted Diedrich vs Casey Tjalsma / Jennifer Aleccia1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI FWL M40&O 8.0 X (6 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Marjori Cantwell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Joan Hannadarrell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
GEORGE CHANG
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Elizabeth Antor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Ted Diedrich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Jennie Wassenaar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rolan Lusaya
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

GEORGE CHANG + Joan Hannadarrell5549% games−5.7% vs expected
Rolan Lusaya + Elizabeth Antor2443% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Antor + GEORGE CHANG134 matchesnot enough data
Marjori Cantwell + Ted Diedrich213 matchesnot enough data
Rolan Lusaya + Jennie Wassenaar033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marjori Cantwell
142W–100L career · 1 line in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Joan Hannadarrell
183W–116L career · 2 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
GEORGE CHANG
92W–83L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
Elizabeth Antor
68W–71L career · 2 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
Ted Diedrich
19W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
Jennie Wassenaar
58W–73L career · 1 line in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.46
Rolan Lusaya
15W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.