Teams

PA Podgurski FWL M40-8.0X

2024 WMI FWL USTA League Mixed 40&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI FWL M40&O 8.0 X (6 player)

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-10-01vs MVC Wassenaar FWL M40-8.0XLost 12
W#1 DoublesSteven Podgurski / Emi Mueller vs Rolan Lusaya / Elizabeth Antor6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Bont / Debbie Buchan vs Ted Diedrich / Marjori Cantwell2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCasey Tjalsma / Kathy Labozzetta vs GEORGE CHANG / Joan Hannadarrell5-7, 0-6
2023-09-17vs MVC Wassenaar FWL M40-8.0XLost 12
L#1 DoublesScott Arlen / Tanya Gonzalez vs GEORGE CHANG / Joan Hannadarrell2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Snyder / Scott Bont vs Rolan Lusaya / Elizabeth Antor3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCasey Tjalsma / Jennifer Aleccia vs Jennie Wassenaar / Ted Diedrich6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI FWL M40&O 8.0 X (6 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Debbie Buchan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.98
Emi Mueller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Scott Arlen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Kristen Snyder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Jennifer Aleccia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Casey Tjalsma
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Steven Podgurski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Kathy Labozzetta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Scott Bont
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tanya Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Podgurski + Kathy Labozzetta61047% games−0.1% vs expected
Tanya Gonzalez + Steven Podgurski2352% gamesnot enough data
Steven Podgurski + Emi Mueller213 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Aleccia + Casey Tjalsma213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Debbie Buchan
166W–66L career · 1 line in 2024
26%73%<1%
4.09
Emi Mueller
82W–39L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.98
Scott Arlen
58W–32L career · 1 line in 2024
2%92%5%
3.78
Kristen Snyder
64W–37L career · 1 line in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.72
Jennifer Aleccia
112W–32L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.72
4
Casey Tjalsma
102W–72L career · 2 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
Steven Podgurski
91W–88L career · 1 line in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.58
Kathy Labozzetta
66W–100L career · 1 line in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.50
Scott Bont
68W–109L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Tanya Gonzalez
65W–75L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.