Teams

LT BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-27vs FCCC REDWon 32
L#1 DoublesPamela Massaro / Lee Anne Kempton vs Laura Cilek / Shanti Green2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKerry Sondgeroth vs Emily Davidson6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTina Spicer / Susana Ortega vs Crystal Osthoff / Kathleen Tremblay7-6, 6-0
L#2 SinglesTiffany Croci vs Nicole Holmes3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesShirley Moore / Mary Wright vs Ann Davidson / Shannon Holt6-4, 6-4
2026-05-13vs TAG TEALWon 40
W#1 DoublesTiffany Croci / Kate Eberle vs Kaitlyn Chenore / Emily Heckel1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLee Anne Kempton vs Dawn Setser6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPamela Massaro / Shirley Moore vs Rachel Baldwin / Jaylin Garcia6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusana Ortega / Janice Sale vs Sandy Chenore / Lori Mooney-Malone4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-11vs MLF ORANGELost 23
L#1 DoublesPamela Massaro / Shirley Moore vs Jessica Oldfield / Kelly Stout4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKerry Sondgeroth vs Kristen McKnight4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusana Ortega / Mary Wright vs Magdalena Joyce / Donna Pham6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLee Anne Kempton vs Tiffany Burns6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesChrista Lund / Janice Sale vs Ashley Sloan / CJ Roberts4-6, 1-6
2026-05-04vs HMTC PURPLELost 23
W#1 DoublesKerry Sondgeroth / Lee Anne Kempton vs Crystal Stowe / Susan Seiler6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTiffany Croci vs Kristin Daniels2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSusana Ortega / Mary Wright vs Lori Masi / Jennifer Grim3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesPamela Massaro vs Jamie Cole6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTina Spicer / Janice Sale vs Marcia Stauter / Michelle Fang6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-20vs FCCC WHITELost 05
L#1 DoublesKerry Sondgeroth / Treasure McPherson vs Tara Delaney / Rachel Yendra3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLee Anne Kempton vs Erin Rasmussen6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesShirley Moore / Pamela Massaro vs Deanna Verchick / Chanel Elliott5-7, 6-7
L#2 SinglesTiffany Croci vs Jessica Allman3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusana Ortega / Christa Lund vs Jennifer Sbicca / Julie Chan4-6, 4-6
2026-04-13vs CSU GREENLost 14
L#1 DoublesShirley Moore / Kate Eberle vs Lisa Martin / Wendy Ball5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTiffany Croci vs Wendy Sprague6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLee Anne Kempton / Mary Wright vs Anne Stavros / Kathy Carlson3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesPamela Massaro vs Audrie Diel4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJanice Sale / Christa Lund vs Amy Dahlgren / Deanna Bekkedahl6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Kerry Sondgeroth
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Tina Spicer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Susana Ortega
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.84
Janice Sale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Treasure McPherson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Shirley Moore
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.76
Lee Anne Kempton
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Kate Eberle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Tiffany Croci
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.64
Pamela Massaro
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.53
Christa Lund
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Anne Kempton + Pamela Massaro6258% games+11.2% vs expected
Lee Anne Kempton + Treasure McPherson3453% games+9.0% vs expected
Janice Sale + Tina Spicer6258% games+2.9% vs expected
Treasure McPherson + Kerry Sondgeroth7850% games+1.2% vs expected
Shirley Moore + Pamela Massaro4445% games−2.2% vs expected
Shirley Moore + Tina Spicer7354% games−4.2% vs expected
Shirley Moore + Susana Ortega134 matchesnot enough data
Tina Spicer + Susana Ortega314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kerry Sondgeroth
18W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Tina Spicer
31W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Susana Ortega
15W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Janice Sale
95W–103L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
Treasure McPherson
21W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
Shirley Moore
34W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Lee Anne Kempton
57W–72L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
Kate Eberle
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Tiffany Croci
23W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Pamela Massaro
31W–37L career · 6 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
Christa Lund
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.