Teams

HMTC PURPLE

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-18vs FCCC REDWon 41
L#1 DoublesLori Masi / Kristin Daniels vs Kara Brown / Laura Cilek3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAnne Spry vs Alison Morgan6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMarcia Stauter / Michelle Fang vs Caroline Schild / Ann Davidson6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMolly Bond vs Emily Davidson6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKimberley Hattem / Crystal Stowe vs Janice Brooks / Libbie Hickman6-1, 6-4
2026-05-11vs TAG TEALSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJennifer Grim / Kelsi Wagner vs Kaitlyn Chenore / Rachel Baldwin7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMolly Bond vs Beth Smits6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLori Masi / Marcia Stauter vs Christy Mascarenas / Emily Heckel6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCrystal Stowe / Kimberley Hattem vs Amy Herold / Sandy Chenore6-3, 6-4
2026-05-07vs CSU GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelsi Wagner / Kristin Daniels vs Jamie Heckman / Amy Molina6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLori Masi / Jennifer Grim vs Amy Dahlgren / Audrie Diel6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCrystal Stowe / Susan Seiler vs Deanna Bekkedahl / Wendy Sprague6-1, 6-0
2026-05-04vs LT BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesCrystal Stowe / Susan Seiler vs Kerry Sondgeroth / Lee Anne Kempton3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKristin Daniels vs Tiffany Croci6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLori Masi / Jennifer Grim vs Susana Ortega / Mary Wright6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarcia Stauter / Michelle Fang vs Tina Spicer / Janice Sale4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-01vs FCCC WHITELost 13
L#1 DoublesKristin Daniels / Jennifer Grim vs Tara Delaney / Ashley McLaughlin4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMolly Bond vs Chanel Elliott2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKelsi Wagner / Marcia Stauter vs Victoria Archer / Erin Rasmussen6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichelle Fang / Susan Seiler vs Deanna Verchick / Erin Paisan4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-20vs MLF ORANGEWon 50
W#1 DoublesJennifer Grim / Kristin Daniels vs Jessica Oldfield / Ashley Sloan3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnne Spry vs Tiffany Burns7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Seiler / Marcia Stauter vs Kristen Haberman / Kristen McKnight7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMolly Bond vs CJ Roberts6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKimberley Hattem / Kelsi Wagner vs Bernita Sterling / Magdalena Joyce6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Anne Spry
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.91
Lori Masi
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Kelsi Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Crystal Stowe
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Jennifer Grim
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.83
Kristin Daniels
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.79
Molly Bond
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.79
Susan Seiler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Kimberley Hattem
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Marcia Stauter
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.67
Michelle Fang
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Grim + Kristin Daniels5352% games+10.3% vs expected
Susan Seiler + Crystal Stowe2352% games+4.3% vs expected
Jennifer Grim + Lori Masi292553% games+1.0% vs expected
Kimberley Hattem + Crystal Stowe5253% games−0.5% vs expected
Kelsi Wagner + Susan Seiler6549% games−1.9% vs expected
Kimberley Hattem + Susan Seiler4546% games−4.7% vs expected
Kimberley Hattem + Jennifer Grim2448% games−5.5% vs expected
Susan Seiler + Lori Masi3350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anne Spry
15W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Lori Masi
87W–75L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Kelsi Wagner
32W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Crystal Stowe
35W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Jennifer Grim
84W–68L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Kristin Daniels
49W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Molly Bond
24W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Susan Seiler
30W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Kimberley Hattem
51W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Marcia Stauter
93W–81L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Michelle Fang
12W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.