Teams

NNM Adult 65 & Over 6.0W Rogers - EG

2025 USTA Adult 65 & Over League - NNM · 6.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesElaine Koyama / Bonnie Rogers vs Ruth Chow / Barbara Morck6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJudith Jenkins / Sarah Salvato vs Donna Harnick / Jane Ryfun5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDarlene Endy / Eileen TYRRELL vs Shirley Wynn / Maureen Merz6-1, 6-3
2025-10-10vs NNM/Holley/Adult65&Over/6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Salvato / Darlene Endy vs JT Schneider / Diana Filliman3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Rubenstein / Anne Constable vs Celeste Guillebaud / Catherine Porto0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBonnie Rogers / Eileen TYRRELL vs Jan Harper / Kathy Clapp3-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesDarlene Endy / Priscilla Roberts vs Shirley Alexander / Susan Anderson6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElaine Koyama / Bonnie Rogers vs Ruth Chow / Barbara Morck6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJudith Jenkins / Tina Roose vs Maureen Merz / Shirley Wynn6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-09-23vs NNM/Holley/Adult65&Over/6.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesElaine Koyama / Priscilla Roberts vs Donna Brennan / Kay McCormick3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEileen TYRRELL / Bonnie Rogers vs Celeste Guillebaud / Jodi Holley6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJane Abbott / Anne Constable vs Kathy Clapp / Betsy Murphy2-6, 6-7
2025-09-19vs NNM/Holley/Adult65&Over/6.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesBonnie Rogers / Elaine Koyama vs Rena Highland / Tammy Gassaway6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDarlene Endy / Anne Constable vs Patti Alcaraz / Jodi Holley4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJudith Jenkins / Janet Rubenstein vs Celeste Guillebaud / Kathy Clapp4-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesDarlene Endy / Elaine Koyama vs Shirley Alexander / Susan Anderson3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Constable / Jane Abbott vs Wendy Morse / Karen Martel6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBonnie Rogers / Eileen TYRRELL vs Jeannette Dunbar / Donna Harnick6-1, 6-4
W#1 DoublesSarah Salvato / Priscilla Roberts vs Barbara Morck / Ruth Chow4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBonnie Rogers / Judith Jenkins vs Wendy Morse / Karen Martel6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJane Abbott / Darlene Endy vs Jeannette Dunbar / Donna Harnick1-6, 3-6
2025-08-29vs NNM/Holley/Adult65&Over/6.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesPriscilla Roberts / Sarah Salvato vs Diana Filliman / Rena Highland6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDarlene Endy / Karen Kott vs Patti Alcaraz / Jodi Holley3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Constable / Janet Rubenstein vs Peggy Jenner / Jan Harper6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Bonnie Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.75
Anne Constable
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.74
Eileen TYRRELL
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.70
Darlene Endy
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.66
Sarah Salvato
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.65
Priscilla Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Karen Kott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Elaine Koyama
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Jane Abbott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Janet Rubenstein
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Judith Jenkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Reba Johnson
published
Tina Roose
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Priscilla Roberts + Sarah Salvato7455% games+6.9% vs expected
Elaine Koyama + Bonnie Rogers5254% games+0.9% vs expected
Priscilla Roberts + Darlene Endy4451% games−8.5% vs expected
Eileen TYRRELL + Bonnie Rogers5451% gamesnot enough data
Judith Jenkins + Sarah Salvato4159% gamesnot enough data
Karen Kott + Anne Constable3250% gamesnot enough data
Priscilla Roberts + Anne Constable134 matchesnot enough data
Darlene Endy + Karen Kott134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bonnie Rogers
20W–41L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Anne Constable
18W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Eileen TYRRELL
17W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Darlene Endy
21W–36L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.70
Sarah Salvato
79W–82L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.66
Priscilla Roberts
54W–51L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
2.65
Karen Kott
13W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Elaine Koyama
11W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.45
Jane Abbott
4W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Rubenstein
11W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Judith Jenkins
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Reba Johnson
2W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tina Roose
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.