Teams

NNM Adult 65 & Over 6.0W Dunbar - HP

2025 USTA Adult 65 & Over League - NNM · 6.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-24vs NNM/Holley/Adult65&Over/6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesShirley Alexander / Susan Anderson vs Diana Filliman / JT Schneider4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKaren Martel / Jane Ryfun vs Kay McCormick / Rena Highland2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeannette Dunbar / Maureen Merz vs Susanna Carlow / Kathy Clapp4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesRuth Chow / Barbara Morck vs Elaine Koyama / Bonnie Rogers3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Harnick / Jane Ryfun vs Judith Jenkins / Sarah Salvato7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesShirley Wynn / Maureen Merz vs Darlene Endy / Eileen TYRRELL1-6, 3-6
2025-10-03vs NNM/Holley/Adult65&Over/6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesShirley Alexander / Susan Anderson vs Donna Brennan / Peggy Jenner4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWendy Morse / Karen Martel vs JT Schneider / Diana Filliman2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeannette Dunbar / Maureen Merz vs Jan Harper / Elizabeth Kerkmans6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesShirley Alexander / Susan Anderson vs Darlene Endy / Priscilla Roberts3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRuth Chow / Barbara Morck vs Elaine Koyama / Bonnie Rogers0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMaureen Merz / Shirley Wynn vs Judith Jenkins / Tina Roose2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesShirley Alexander / Susan Anderson vs Darlene Endy / Elaine Koyama6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWendy Morse / Karen Martel vs Anne Constable / Jane Abbott2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeannette Dunbar / Donna Harnick vs Bonnie Rogers / Eileen TYRRELL1-6, 4-6
2025-09-09vs NNM/Holley/Adult65&Over/6.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesShirley Alexander / Susan Anderson vs Catherine Porto / Elizabeth Kerkmans6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaren Martel / Barbara Morck vs Diana Filliman / JT Schneider2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMaureen Merz / Wendy Morse vs Celeste Guillebaud / Tammy Gassaway1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesBarbara Morck / Ruth Chow vs Sarah Salvato / Priscilla Roberts6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesWendy Morse / Karen Martel vs Bonnie Rogers / Judith Jenkins2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeannette Dunbar / Donna Harnick vs Jane Abbott / Darlene Endy6-1, 6-3
2025-09-02vs NNM/Holley/Adult65&Over/6.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesShirley Alexander / Susan Anderson vs Diana Filliman / Celeste Guillebaud6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRuth Chow / Wendy Morse vs Jodi Holley / Patti Alcaraz4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Morck / Donna Harnick vs Betsy Murphy / Susanna Carlow4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Shirley Alexander
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Donna Harnick
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.64
Jane Ryfun
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Wendy Morse
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.56
Barbara Morck
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.54
Ruth Chow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Karen Martel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Jeannette Dunbar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Maureen Merz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.31
Shirley Wynn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Martel + Jane Ryfun3844% games−2.3% vs expected
Jeannette Dunbar + Ruth Chow31138% games−7.3% vs expected
Jane Ryfun + Ruth Chow2361% gamesnot enough data
Karen Martel + Jeannette Dunbar134 matchesnot enough data
Karen Martel + Wendy Morse224 matchesnot enough data
Maureen Merz + Jeannette Dunbar134 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Morck + Ruth Chow134 matchesnot enough data
Karen Martel + Ruth Chow123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shirley Alexander
39W–108L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Donna Harnick
45W–77L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.72
Jane Ryfun
43W–87L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
2.64
Wendy Morse
14W–38L career · 5 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Barbara Morck
62W–141L career · 10 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Ruth Chow
28W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Karen Martel
21W–46L career · 5 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.50
Jeannette Dunbar
31W–84L career · 4 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Maureen Merz
9W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.45
Shirley Wynn
14W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.