Teams

Roch: McConnell/Karr

2021 18&Over Women · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-22vs Empire Tennis AcademyWon 30
W#2 DoublesLisa McConnell / Nina Bose vs Valerie Kuykendall / Deborah New6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesNicole Tschiderer vs Tien Kim6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDeborah DeCicco / Martine Haralambides vs Denise Martino / Amanda Dwyer6-1, 6-3
2021-07-21vs FoxWon 32
W#1 DoublesJennifer Karr / Sarah Sorrentino vs Margaret Murphy / Jayne Wilson6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMartine Haralambides vs Amy Judson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesClaudia Ohl / Nicole Tschiderer vs Holly Geary / Lauren Kaduc2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesShelley Alfieri vs Shannon Cunniffe6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarcia Brayer / Claire Stoner vs Alissa Roger / Lauren Henderson6-4, 6-1
2021-07-19vs Empire Tennis AcademyWon 31
W#1 DoublesDeborah DeCicco / Claire Stoner vs Maureen Goldsmith / Valerie Kuykendall6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKatie Shepard / Lisa McConnell vs Deborah New / Tien Kim6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMonica Hodis vs Colby Finn6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesClaudia Ohl / Nina Bose vs Amanda Dwyer / Denise Martino6-2, 6-2
2021-06-26vs FullerSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMonica Hodis / Jacqueline Sinclair Parker vs Jennifer Ponce / Amy Crossed3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Karr / Marcia Brayer vs Kathleen Savage / Elizabeth Goodman0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesShelley Alfieri vs Nicole Sayers6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMartine Haralambides / Joan Aiello vs Jessica Shanahan / Kathleen Crane6-2, 6-1
2021-05-27vs FoxWon 41
W#1 DoublesJoan Aiello / Katie Shepard vs Jackie Fox / Shannon Cunniffe4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMartine Haralambides vs Amy Judson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Karr / Sarah Sorrentino vs Heather Ralph / Alissa Roger6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesShelley Alfieri vs Tenley Odenbach6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Sinclair Parker / Monica Hodis vs Colleen Pichette / Holly Geary6-3, 6-1
2021-05-20vs FullerSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJennifer Karr / Marcia Brayer vs Jennifer Ponce / Amy Crossed6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesShelley Alfieri vs Nicole Sayers6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoan Aiello / Martine Haralambides vs Kathleen Savage / Elizabeth Goodman6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesClaudia Ohl / Lisa McConnell vs Jill Nikas / Stacey Pollack6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Roch: McConnell/Karr6022817173
2Fox33171327225

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Marcia Brayer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.28
Jennifer Karr
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Jacqueline Sinclair Parker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Claire Stoner
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.16
Shelley Alfieri
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.11
Monica Hodis
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Katie Shepard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Nicole Tschiderer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.82
Deborah DeCicco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Joan Aiello
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Claudia Ohl
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa McConnell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Martine Haralambides
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Aiello + Katie Shepard6260% games+9.3% vs expected
Claire Stoner + Marcia Brayer9161% games+5.0% vs expected
Lisa McConnell + Deborah DeCicco1544% games−8.0% vs expected
Shelley Alfieri + Jennifer Karr4259% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Karr + Katie Shepard314 matchesnot enough data
Lisa McConnell + Joan Aiello303 matchesnot enough data
Lisa McConnell + Claudia Ohl213 matchesnot enough data
Claire Stoner + Shelley Alfieri213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Marcia Brayer
92W–38L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
Jennifer Karr
65W–30L career · 8 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Jacqueline Sinclair Parker
25W–53L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Claire Stoner
58W–42L career · 7 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Shelley Alfieri
137W–98L career · 10 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.16
Monica Hodis
28W–42L career · 3 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
Katie Shepard
22W–8L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%30%70%
3.07
Nicole Tschiderer
28W–24L career · 2 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Deborah DeCicco
36W–43L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
Joan Aiello
58W–36L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
Claudia Ohl
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa McConnell
25W–32L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Martine Haralambides
22W–9L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.