Teams

Fuller

2021 18&Over Women · 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.30 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-21vs FoxWon 32
W#1 DoublesKathleen Savage / Elizabeth Goodman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAmy Crossed vs Amy Judson2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Ponce / Jessica Shanahan vs Holly Geary / Jackie Fox7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesNatalie Loh vs Lauren Henderson6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJill Nikas / Catherine Fuller vs Lauren Kaduc / Heather Ralph0-6, 4-6
2021-07-20vs Empire Tennis AcademyWon 41
W#1 DoublesKathleen Savage / Rita Johnson vs Tien Kim / Emily Horsington6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAmy Crossed vs Spencer Strowe6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHeather Upchurch / Kathleen Crane vs Denise Martino / Karen Soanes6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJennifer Ponce vs Erika Rosenberg1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Fuller / Stacey Pollack vs Valerie Kuykendall / Deborah New6-2, 6-3
2021-06-26vs Roch: McConnell/KarrLost 23
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ponce / Amy Crossed vs Monica Hodis / Jacqueline Sinclair Parker6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesNatalie Loh vs Sarah Sorrentino0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Savage / Elizabeth Goodman vs Jennifer Karr / Marcia Brayer6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNicole Sayers vs Shelley Alfieri0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Shanahan / Kathleen Crane vs Martine Haralambides / Joan Aiello2-6, 1-6
2021-06-07vs Empire Tennis AcademyWon 41
L#1 DoublesJessica Shanahan / Rita Johnson vs Maureen Goldsmith / Tien Kim6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmy Crossed vs Erika Rosenberg7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Fuller / Jill Nikas vs Amanda Dwyer / Karen Soanes6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesNatalie Loh vs Emily Horsington6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeather Upchurch / Susan Ververs vs Valerie Kuykendall / Spencer Strowe6-0, 6-0
2021-06-03vs FoxLost 23
L#1 DoublesKathleen Savage / Elizabeth Goodman vs Jayne Wilson / Tenley Odenbach5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Crossed vs Amy Judson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Fuller / Jill Nikas vs Shannon Cunniffe / Margaret Murphy1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesNicole Sayers vs Colleen Pichette6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStacey Pollack / Rita Johnson vs Jackie Fox / Holly Geary6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2021-05-20vs Roch: McConnell/KarrLost 23
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ponce / Amy Crossed vs Jennifer Karr / Marcia Brayer3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNicole Sayers vs Shelley Alfieri3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Savage / Elizabeth Goodman vs Joan Aiello / Martine Haralambides1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesSusan Ververs vs Sarah Sorrentino3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJill Nikas / Stacey Pollack vs Claudia Ohl / Lisa McConnell3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Kathleen Savage
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.30
Amy Crossed
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Theresa Croce
published
3.06
Nicole Sayers
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.99
Jennifer Ponce
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.94
Natalie Loh
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.80
Catherine Fuller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.65
Elizabeth Goodman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Stacey Pollack
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Mealey
published
Jessica Shanahan
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kathleen Crane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Rita Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Ververs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Goodman + Kathleen Savage2444% games−10.1% vs expected
Rita Johnson + Amy Crossed4354% gamesnot enough data
Amy Crossed + Kathleen Savage404 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Ponce + Jessica Shanahan404 matchesnot enough data
Amy Crossed + Jennifer Ponce303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kathleen Savage
101W–64L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Amy Crossed
55W–40L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Theresa Croce
18W–35L career · no lines in 2021
99%1%<1%
3.18
Nicole Sayers
44W–39L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Jennifer Ponce
109W–55L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%52%48%
2.99
Natalie Loh
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
2.94
3.5
Catherine Fuller
10W–27L career · type S · 4 lines in 2021
94%6%<1%
2.80
3
Elizabeth Goodman
24W–25L career · 3 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
2.65
Stacey Pollack
9W–11L career · 3 lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
2.50
Amy Mealey
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jessica Shanahan
14W–13L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathleen Crane
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rita Johnson
13W–20L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Ververs
8W–26L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.