Teams

KY/LEX/Lykins3.0

2024 USTA FALL LEAGUE 18 & Over · 3.0 WOMEN

15 players · average NTRP 3.17 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-13vs KY/LEX/KingLost 03
L#1 DoublesTaylor James / Katelyn Meckes vs Cathy Crutchfield / Ling Wolbarst7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesApril Russell vs Taylor Wilcox5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrittni Fain-Marnitz / Mary Todd vs Shama Hinard / Lee Ann Sheehy2-6, 5-7
2024-12-06vs KY/LEX/NiWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrooke Marnitz / Leah Lykins vs Davis Dickens / Ann Albrecht6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKristi Martin vs Lucy Butt4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAshley Gillispie / Callie Manor vs Aya Tsuchiya / Sachie Shiga2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-11-23vs KY/LEX/KingSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMaddie Herbert / Brooke Hamilton vs Cathy Crutchfield / Monica King0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKristi Martin vs Shama Hinard6-2, 6-0
2024-11-09vs KY/LEX/NiLost 02
L#1 DoublesLeah Lykins / Brooke Marnitz vs Sophie Schmidt / Lee Walker4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristi Martin vs Lucy Butt7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2024-11-03vs KY/LEX/KingWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeah Lykins / Kristi Martin vs Monica King / Ling Wolbarst6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesCallie Manor vs Layne Cutler6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesApril Russell / Rhonda Hilton vs Katie Landon / Shama Hinard6-1, 6-3
2024-10-23vs KY/LEX/NiLost 12
W#1 DoublesLeah Lykins / Brooke Marnitz vs Ann Albrecht / Dana Gerken6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesApril Russell vs Lee Walker6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRhonda Hilton / Callie Manor vs Patty Ni / Davis Dickens6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2024-10-10vs KY/LEX/KingWon 21
W#1 DoublesRhonda Hilton / Sarah Back vs Lee Ann Sheehy / Amy Johns6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCallie Manor vs Blake Adams6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBrooke Hamilton / Brittni Fain-Marnitz vs Monica King / Andrea Covington6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-10-04vs KY/LEX/NiLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeah Lykins / Ashley Gillispie vs Dana Gerken / Madison Liford1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesApril Russell vs Sophie Schmidt4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Hamilton / Brittni Fain-Marnitz vs Ann Albrecht / Aya Tsuchiya3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Callie Manor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Brooke Marnitz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.05
Sarah Back
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
April Russell
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.90
Katelyn Meckes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Natalie Avant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Kristi Martin
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.83
Rhonda Hilton
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.76
Leah Lykins
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Brooke Hamilton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Shannon Wang
published
2.52
Brittni Fain-Marnitz
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.45
Ashley Gillispie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.39
Maddie Herbert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Taylor James
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leah Lykins + Brooke Marnitz4171% games+22.9% vs expected
Kristi Martin + Leah Lykins2348% games+4.3% vs expected
April Russell + Rhonda Hilton314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Callie Manor
61W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Brooke Marnitz
21W–8L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
Sarah Back
13W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
April Russell
50W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.99
Katelyn Meckes
22W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.90
Natalie Avant
4W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.88
Kristi Martin
33W–24L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
2.83
Rhonda Hilton
39W–48L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Leah Lykins
36W–38L career · 8 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Brooke Hamilton
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shannon Wang
12W–17L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Brittni Fain-Marnitz
16W–14L career · 8 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
2.52
3
Ashley Gillispie
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.45
Maddie Herbert
5W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
79%21%<1%
2.39
Taylor James
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.