Teams

Ourso-CC

2025 CORTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring · Women 4.5

8 players · average NTRP 4.33 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-23vs Gunn-CCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRebecca DeLoach / Jennifer Wampler vs Penny Dillon / Madelyn Boren2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Ourso / Annie Kirkland vs Charity Wagenti / Kathleen Whitley4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-02-22vs Bergman-YTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnnie Kirkland / Robin Huskisson vs Tomoko Maeda / Jessica Bodine3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Ourso / Rebecca DeLoach vs Munkyung Kim / Andi Lee6-3, 6-2
2025-02-10vs Gunn-CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Ourso / Annie Kirkland vs Teresa Gunn / Madelyn Boren3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMary Elizabeth Cawthorne vs Penny Dillon3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca DeLoach / Jennifer Wampler vs Charity Wagenti / Kathleen Whitley3-6, 2-6
2025-02-01vs Bergman-YTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Cronise / Robin Huskisson vs Tomoko Maeda / Ann Bergman5-7, 4-5
L#1 SinglesMary Elizabeth Cawthorne vs Dawson Fite6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca DeLoach / Amy Ourso vs Munkyung Kim / Andi Lee6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Alison Cripe
published 4.5
4.30
Robin Huskisson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.15
Julie Cronise
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.09
Amy Ourso
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.99
Annie Kirkland
usually #1 Singles 31%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published 4
3.97
Rebecca DeLoach
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
3.87
Mary Elizabeth Cawthorne
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.86
Jennifer Wampler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Huskisson + Julie Cronise314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Wampler + Rebecca DeLoach134 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Wampler + Julie Cronise134 matchesnot enough data
Amy Ourso + Julie Cronise213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alison Cripe
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31
Robin Huskisson
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.30
Julie Cronise
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Amy Ourso
22W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.09
4
Annie Kirkland
118W–47L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
Rebecca DeLoach
100W–30L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.97
Mary Elizabeth Cawthorne
37W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.87
Jennifer Wampler
26W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.