Teams

Bergman-YTC

2025 CORTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring · Women 4.5

7 players · average NTRP 4.33 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-01vs Gunn-CCLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnn Bergman / Jessica Bodine vs Charity Wagenti / Madelyn Boren1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDawson Fite vs Penny Dillon3-6, 4-6
2025-02-25vs Gunn-CCWon 20
W#1 DoublesJessica Bodine / Natalie Bleazard vs Penny Dillon / Madelyn Boren6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Bergman / Dawson Fite vs Teresa Gunn / Christy Bates6-4, 0-1
2025-02-22vs Ourso-CCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTomoko Maeda / Jessica Bodine vs Annie Kirkland / Robin Huskisson6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMunkyung Kim / Andi Lee vs Amy Ourso / Rebecca DeLoach3-6, 2-6
2025-02-01vs Ourso-CCWon 21
W#1 DoublesTomoko Maeda / Ann Bergman vs Julie Cronise / Robin Huskisson7-5, 5-4
W#1 SinglesDawson Fite vs Mary Elizabeth Cawthorne1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMunkyung Kim / Andi Lee vs Rebecca DeLoach / Amy Ourso4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Dawson Fite
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.75
Ann Bergman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Andi Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.50
Jessica Bodine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Munkyung Kim
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.18
Tomoko Maeda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Natalie Bleazard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andi Lee + Tomoko Maeda5170% games+23.9% vs expected
Andi Lee + Munkyung Kim14857% games+4.5% vs expected
Andi Lee + Jessica Bodine8061% games+3.3% vs expected
Ann Bergman + Jessica Bodine123 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Bodine + Tomoko Maeda303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dawson Fite
45W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.04
4
Ann Bergman
7W–11L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4.5
Andi Lee
64W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.73
Jessica Bodine
21W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Munkyung Kim
66W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Tomoko Maeda
32W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.18
Natalie Bleazard
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.