Teams

TOC.Sachan

2023 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-25Won 10
W#2 SinglesManish Maheshwari vs Benjamin Black6-4, 6-1
2023-08-23vs TOC.KaneWon 20
W#2 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Michael Muller6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Dash Rajarajhan5-7, 5-0
2023-08-08vs TOHS.ByrdLost 02
L#1 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Jackson Cabell3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesManish Maheshwari vs Craig Radley3-6, 1-6
2023-07-30vs TOC.LlewellynWon 21
W#1 SinglesAnil Chawla vs William Clark6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesGhanshyamsinh Gohil vs Raymond Xu6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesOlimani Deivasigamani vs Ryan Sheppard3-6, 3-6
2023-07-25Won 20
W#1 SinglesAnil Chawla vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesManish Maheshwari vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-12vs TOC.KaneWon 20
W#1 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Michael Muller6-2, 7-5
W#3 SinglesManish Maheshwari vs Philip Singer3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-11vs TOHS.ByrdLost 01
L#1 SinglesManish Maheshwari vs Craig Radley4-6, 4-6
2023-06-28vs MVL.PerianWon 10
W#3 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Vamsee Pasangulapati6-1, 4-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Anil Chawla
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4.5
4.11
Ghanshyamsinh Gohil
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4
3.88
Diego Angelo
published 4
3.57
Manish Maheshwari
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.56
Olimani Deivasigamani
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.43
Amit Sachan
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
Pawan Kumar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amit Sachan + Ghanshyamsinh Gohil6252% gamesnot enough data
Amit Sachan + Manish Maheshwari123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anil Chawla
63W–49L career · 7 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.20
4
Ghanshyamsinh Gohil
200W–81L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
4.11
4
Diego Angelo
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Manish Maheshwari
49W–52L career · 5 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Olimani Deivasigamani
161W–71L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Amit Sachan
255W–240L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
Pawan Kumar
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.