Teams

TOHS.Byrd

2023 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-22vs MVL.PerianSplit 11
W#2 SinglesJackson Cabell vs Chris Henderson6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesRyan Berliner vs Santha Perian1-6, 1-6
2023-08-08vs TOC.SachanWon 10
W#1 SinglesJackson Cabell vs Amit Sachan6-3, 6-0
2023-07-31Won 10
W#2 SinglesJeron Russell vs Robert Johnson6-2, 6-1
2023-07-25vs TOC.LlewellynSplit 11
W#2 SinglesJackson Cabell vs Zack Czajkowski5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJeron Russell vs William Clark4-6, 4-6
2023-07-18Won 10
W#3 SinglesMigel Hidalgo Saldana vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-11vs TOC.SachanWon 10
W#2 SinglesJeron Russell vs Diego Angelo6-2, 6-0
2023-07-11vs APEX.BlackSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJackson Cabell vs Christopher Shelton6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMigel Hidalgo Saldana vs Vineeth Malneedi6-7, 3-6
2023-06-12Won 10
W#2 SinglesMigel Hidalgo Saldana vs Hugh Cole6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Tyler Carroll
published
4.08
Migel Hidalgo Saldana
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
Jermaine Byrd
published 4.5
4.02
Aubry Carmody
published 4
3.96
Jeron Russell
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.95
Craig Radley
published 4
3.90
Jackson Cabell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.88
Alejandro Fernandez
published 4.5
3.75
Ryan Berliner
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeron Russell + Jackson Cabell171850% games+5.3% vs expected
Jermaine Byrd + Migel Hidalgo Saldana213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tyler Carroll
29W–29L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
4.31
4.5
Migel Hidalgo Saldana
98W–61L career · 3 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
136W–127L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
4.06
4
Aubry Carmody
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
4.02
4
Jeron Russell
143W–90L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Craig Radley
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.95
4.5
Jackson Cabell
45W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.90
4.5
Alejandro Fernandez
5W–14L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.88
4
Ryan Berliner
113W–104L career · 1 line in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.