Teams

CV-Mission Hills/Ringer

2023 SCTA Adult 65 & Over - CV · CV Women 9.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for CV Women 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Marjo Hull
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Cheryl Evans
published 4
3.73
Thelma Sahara
published
3.58
Mary Kaump
published
Heather Fiscalini
published
Janis Hasse
published
Patricia Dudley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marjo Hull + Thelma Sahara8458% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marjo Hull
129W–94L career · 9 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Cheryl Evans
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thelma Sahara
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Mary Kaump
21W–19L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Heather Fiscalini
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Janis Hasse
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Dudley
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.