Teams

SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA10

2025 Tri-Level League - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 2.5

24 players · average NTRP 3.23 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesPam Barbato / Sandra Zane vs Paula Quesada / Adriana Higuera4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJunko Noguchi / Kay Taylor vs Ariana Garcia / Corinda Hayes6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-08-10vs SGV Kill Shots-Nowacki-Arcadia/SU4Lost 12
L#1 DoublesShannon Koeppen / Rebecca Berman vs Jessica Guerrero / Julia Arnold3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKay Taylor / Miki Makiko Shimizu vs Marisa Oh / Kelsey Mezzenga6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJoyce Zhu / Lea Zhang vs Le Trieu / Cristina Siruno6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJunko Noguchi / Miki Makiko Shimizu vs Ariana Garcia / Adriana Higuera2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Monica Anderson
published
3.54
Jill Jobran
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.48
Elena Salinas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Shannon Koeppen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Pam Barbato
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Rebecca Berman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Joanna Gardner
published
3.06
Pat Guttormsen
published
3.05
Junko Noguchi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.03
Sandra Zane
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Miki Makiko Shimizu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Stacy Ball
published 3
2.91
Oraer Pluta
published 3
2.87
Deborah Kim
published 3
2.87
Wanyun Zhu
published
2.86
Alice Markowski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Sophia Chang
published
2.78
Joyce Zhu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Jan Li
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Katherine Lasiter
published
2.37
Amy Croushore
published 3
2.26
Lea Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Thaianne Dashti
published
Yeiwon Park
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan Li + Junko Noguchi4261% games+11.4% vs expected
Sandra Zane + Pam Barbato2642% gamesnot enough data
Alice Markowski + Junko Noguchi4163% gamesnot enough data
Oraer Pluta + Junko Noguchi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Monica Anderson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Jill Jobran
171W–46L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
4
Elena Salinas
140W–158L career · 6 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
Shannon Koeppen
29W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
3.5
Pam Barbato
100W–64L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Rebecca Berman
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Joanna Gardner
29W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
Pat Guttormsen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Junko Noguchi
72W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3.5
Sandra Zane
146W–141L career · 6 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Miki Makiko Shimizu
20W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.94
3
Stacy Ball
131W–150L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Oraer Pluta
62W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Deborah Kim
23W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Wanyun Zhu
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.87
3
Alice Markowski
70W–69L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Sophia Chang
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Joyce Zhu
10W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Jan Li
62W–50L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Katherine Lasiter
0W–14L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
3
Amy Croushore
1W–12L career · no lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.37
Lea Zhang
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%96%4%
2.26
Thaianne Dashti
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yeiwon Park
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.