Teams

SGV Sloppy Topspin-Higuera-Downey HS/SA 11:30

2025 Tri-Level League - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesAriana Garcia / Paula Quesada vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesPaula Quesada / Ariana Garcia vs Demmi Setyono / Alexandra Steele Cooper4-6, 2-6
2025-08-16vs SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaula Quesada / Adriana Higuera vs Pam Barbato / Sandra Zane6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesAdriana Higuera / Paula Quesada vs Julia Arnold / Jessica Guerrero0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAriana Garcia / Paula Quesada vs Jenniffer Wong / Tracy Lee1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-07-12Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMegumi Kodama / Paula Quesada vs Kay Taylor / Sandra Zane1-6, 1-6
2025-07-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaula Quesada / Megumi Kodama vs Nancy Wong-Thomas / Jennifer Giancola4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Paula Quesada
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.21
Adriana Higuera
published 3.5
3.13
Ariana Garcia
published 3
2.89
Vanessa Vanda
published
2.78
Megumi Kodama
published
2.72
Lisa Santana
published
2.47
Corinda Hayes
published 3
2.27
Efe Oghoghome
published
2.19
Yoli Van Der Most
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ariana Garcia + Adriana Higuera12263% games+12.8% vs expected
Paula Quesada + Adriana Higuera224 matchesnot enough data
Efe Oghoghome + Lisa Santana224 matchesnot enough data
Ariana Garcia + Megumi Kodama303 matchesnot enough data
Adriana Higuera + Megumi Kodama033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Paula Quesada
17W–29L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Adriana Higuera
27W–13L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3
Ariana Garcia
31W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
Vanessa Vanda
19W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Megumi Kodama
15W–16L career · no lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.78
Lisa Santana
16W–16L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Corinda Hayes
7W–18L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47
Efe Oghoghome
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Yoli Van Der Most
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.