Teams

Corey Reich Tennis Center 55AM9.0A

2026 ADULT 55&Over · Men 9.0

26 players · average NTRP 4.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-24vs MORAGA CC 55AM9.0AWon 20
W#1 DoublesLyle E Johnson / Curtis Dunn vs Don Dendinger / Scott Eversole6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrian Barlay / David Richmond vs David Edson / Craig Straub6-2, 6-1
2026-05-23vs PLEASANTON 55AM9.0AWon 30
W#1 DoublesSamuel Pleasure / Michael Rennels vs Ed Chun / Bang Nguyen3-5
W#2 DoublesDemian Entrekin / Michael Viani vs John Ehlert / Shang Liu6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrian Heimbecker / Pierre Breber vs Wayne Hagstrom / Walt Jefferson7-5, 6-4
2026-05-23vs PLEASANTON 55AM9.0ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesLyle E Johnson / Staffan Svenson vs Ed Chun / Bang Nguyen3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCraig Lazarchik / Samuel Pleasure vs John Ehlert / Shang Liu7-6, 6-1
W#1 DoublesLyle E Johnson / Craig Lazarchik vs Michael Bedard / Mike Welden5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeff MacHle / David Richmond vs Kurt Sindel / Sanjay Backliwal6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDoug Ditmer / David Chang vs Peter Sullivan / Richard Chapman3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesRick Kepler / Jeff Wright vs Akiva Elias / Conrad Lai6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGlenn Teixeira / Doug Ditmer vs Kurt Sindel / Sanjay Backliwal2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Viani / Michael Rennels vs Ralph Saviano / Martin Nunez7-5, 6-3
2026-05-03vs PLEASANTON 55AM9.0ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeff Wright / Craig Lazarchik vs Jaime Santos / Neeraj Sharma6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGlenn Teixeira / Michael Nathe vs Ed Chun / Rick Morris6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesMark McKeen / Jeff Wright vs Mike Welden / Kurt Sindel6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeff MacHle / Staffan Svenson vs Martin Dunlap / Richard Chapman4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJustin Lu / Brian Barlay vs Ralph Saviano / Steven Lehmer4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-04-19vs MORAGA CC 55AM9.0AWon 21
W#1 DoublesPierre Breber / Christopher Belloli vs Edward Buckley / Eric Peterson6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Barlay / Rick Kepler vs Steven Chan / Bryan Rodrigues1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPhil Beilin / Roman Olmos vs Leif Krauss / David Edson2-6, 4-6
2026-03-29vs MORAGA CC 55AM9.0AWon 30
W#1 DoublesRoman Olmos / Mark McKeen vs Eric Peterson / Edward Buckley6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCurtis Dunn / Demian Entrekin vs Byron Bardy / Aaron George6-4, 1-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Rennels / Michael Viani vs Andrew Oliver / Mark Bohuslav6-4, 6-0
W#1 DoublesChristopher Belloli / George Manolis vs Michael Attiyeh / Martin Dunlap6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJustin Lu / David Chang vs Peter Sullivan / Sanjay Backliwal6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPaul Gee / Brian Heimbecker vs Martin Nunez / Ralph Saviano4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · Men 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GOLD RIVER RC 55AM9.0A1002739124
2Corey Reich Tennis Center 55AM9.0A10024618207
3PENINSULA TC 55AM9.0A9124617190
4TIBURON PEN C 55AM9.0A802139130
5LOS GATOS SR 55AM9.0A64151534279
6UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 55AM9.0A55171331252
7MORAGA CC 55AM9.0A55131738272
8MARIN TC 55AM9.0A34101126198
9WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM9.0A36131432251
10SPARE TIME INDOOR TC 55AM9.0A37102043276
11AUBURN R and F 55AM9.0A2882249318
12PLEASANTON 55AM9.0A1872044307
13ROHNERT PK TC/MAGNOLIA/M PK 55AM9.0A0721938243
14BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 55AM9.0A01042655334

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 24 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.82
Curtis Dunn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.72
Christopher Belloli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.51
Michael Viani
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.48
Craig Lazarchik
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.48
Mark McKeen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.41
Justin Lu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.33
Doug Ditmer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.32
Staffan Svenson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.29
Brian Heimbecker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.27
David Richmond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Brian Barlay
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.23
Roman Olmos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.16
Jeff MacHle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.10
Glenn Teixeira
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
4.09
Michael Nathe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.08
Carlito Llavanes
published 4.5
4.04
Martin Manqueros
published
3.91
George Manolis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Paul Gee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.90
Phil Beilin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Michael Rennels
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Demian Entrekin
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.81
Lyle E Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Samuel Pleasure
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Pierre Breber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Rick Kepler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Rennels + Samuel Pleasure213 matchesnot enough data
Jeff MacHle + David Richmond213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Curtis Dunn
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.82
5
Christopher Belloli
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.72
Michael Viani
6W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.51
4.5
Craig Lazarchik
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
4.48
Mark McKeen
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
4.48
Justin Lu
24W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
4.41
Doug Ditmer
10W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
Staffan Svenson
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
5
Brian Heimbecker
367W–83L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.29
4.5
David Richmond
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Brian Barlay
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
4.24
Roman Olmos
13W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
Jeff MacHle
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
4.16
Glenn Teixeira
33W–16L career · 14 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.10
Michael Nathe
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Carlito Llavanes
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
4.08
Martin Manqueros
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
4.04
George Manolis
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
Paul Gee
17W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
Phil Beilin
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
77%23%<1%
3.90
Michael Rennels
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Demian Entrekin
7W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.84
Lyle E Johnson
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
Samuel Pleasure
13W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Pierre Breber
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rick Kepler
18W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.