Teams

LA - Diversity

2022 USTA MxD 18 & Over - LA · LA - 9.0 Mixed Doubles

13 players · average NTRP 4.28 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-02-26vs LA-LLW-LATC-Jill BaumanLost 01
L#1 DoublesLorna Kim / Richard Ortiz-Reyes vs Noah Joachim / Nilou Panahpour1-6, 0-6
2022-02-20vs LA - Sets on FireLost 01
L#2 DoublesLorna Kim / Edward Wedding vs Abbigail Fietzer / Joshua Gurevich6-7, 3-6
2022-02-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRoselle Paskus / Gerald Blankson vs Godwin Omuta / Jenny Ratkovich3-6, 3-6
2022-01-29vs LA - Sets on FireLost 01
L#2 DoublesGeraldine Brantley / Carlos Flores vs Ashley Saccoccio / Kyle Wood3-6, 5-7
2022-01-08vs LA - Sets on FireLost 01
L#3 DoublesRoselle Paskus / Victor Champion vs Mandi Collier / Kyle Pawlak2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - 9.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Daniel Soto
published 4.5
4.30
Hanre Chang
published 4.5
Cheryl Park
published 4.5
Derrick Perry
published 4.5
4.09
Jennifer Portillo
published
4.08
Roselle Paskus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.81
Renee Campbell
published
3.78
Richard Ortiz-Reyes
published
3.70
Lorna Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Edward Wedding
published 4
3.57
Geraldine Brantley
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Gerald Blankson
published 4
Sherryl Chaffin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Soto
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Hanre Chang
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Cheryl Park
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Derrick Perry
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Portillo
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
4.09
4.5
Roselle Paskus
101W–105L career · 2 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
4.08
Renee Campbell
13W–23L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Richard Ortiz-Reyes
22W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Lorna Kim
210W–162L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Edward Wedding
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Geraldine Brantley
63W–104L career · 6 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Gerald Blankson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
Sherryl Chaffin
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.