Teams

Hampshire 18+ 2.5 Team

2025 18&Over Women · 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-25vs Sportime MBYC -ArmadaWon 10
W#1 DoublesBambi Fisher / Anne Wagstaff vs Lorraine Monchak / Kally Atkins6-1, 7-5
W#1 DoublesMelisa Prevost / Erica Zimmerman vs Sing Duffy / Laura Anker6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCarol Wershaw / Carol Froehlich-Hull vs Annette McCann / Alyssa Constant1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesErica Zimmerman / Bambi Fisher vs Jennifer Hobdy / Emilie Soto1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnne Wagstaff / Melissa Fiorina vs Purvi Shah / Kerry Tarr1-6, 2-6
2025-06-02vs Maximum Tennis Development ZoneWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Wagstaff / Erica Zimmerman vs Alison McCormack / Donna Parente7-6, 5-7
2025-05-19vs Flint Park Village PeopleWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusie Sigel / Bambi Fisher vs Evelyn Serowik / Leigh Diana6-0, 6-0
2025-05-12vs Sportime HI - Hit SquadWon 10
W#1 SinglesAnne Wagstaff vs Alisha Vazquez7-5, 6-7
L#1 DoublesAnne Wagstaff / Bambi Fisher vs Stephanie Leone / Samantha Lituchy3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-04-28vs NYAC: Alley CatsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Fiorina / Bambi Fisher vs Anna-Liisa Corsi / Michele Egan2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings29 teams · 2.5
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alison McElwee
published 2.5
Bambi Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Carol Froehlich-Hull
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Carol Wershaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.23
Anne Wagstaff
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Erica Zimmerman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Melisa Prevost
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Fiorina
published
Vicki Ehrlich
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Alison McElwee
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Bambi Fisher
2W–5L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Carol Froehlich-Hull
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Carol Wershaw
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Anne Wagstaff
8W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
Erica Zimmerman
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melisa Prevost
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Fiorina
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vicki Ehrlich
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.