Teams

Amackassin Club 2.5ers

2025 18&Over Women · 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesNoreen Nezaj / Christine Celli vs Lynn Meyers / Lisa Gradilone2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCelia Guerra vs Maureen Burr6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Rubin / Kristin Fallon-Hanley vs Jessica Katsikas / Francesca O'Donovan1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesChristine Celli / Andrea Pucci vs Pamela Opdyke / Kate MacHan5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNoelle DelGiudice vs S Kasim6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Fallon-Hanley / Carissa Davis vs Anu Mallapaty / Catherine Murphy6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesNoreen Nezaj / Celia Guerra vs Katie Geraghty / Angela Corio0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Rubin / Arlene Burlingham vs Michelle Rorke / Heather Shea4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-06-09vs Club Fit Briarcliff Tuf LuvLost 03
L#1 DoublesKimberly McDermott / Noelle DelGiudice vs Jacqueline Brabants / Masha Gregorius5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLaura Rubin vs Chloe Wang1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarissa Davis / Noreen Nezaj vs Mei Morris / Kristin Miles0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesLaura Rubin / Celia Guerra vs Elly Roman / Melissa Gamache7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrea Pucci / Carissa Davis vs Prudence Fisher / Leah VanDeloo0-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesChristine Celli / Celia Guerra vs Melinda Chiavaro / Cara Eisenpress6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNoelle DelGiudice vs Gabrielle Thal-Pruzan6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Rubin / Noreen Nezaj vs Catherine Meyer / Nicole Lee6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNoelle DelGiudice vs Lisa Masuda5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesArlene Burlingham / Kathy McKeon vs Tatyana Farmer / Karen McCarthy1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings29 teams · 2.5
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.14 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dennis Jacobi
published 3.5
2.33
Noelle DelGiudice
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Celia Guerra
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.06
Laura Rubin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.01
Andrea Pucci
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Kathy McKeon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kristin Fallon-Hanley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Noreen Nezaj
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dennis Jacobi
7W–1L career · type D · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Noelle DelGiudice
14W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.33
2.5
Celia Guerra
3W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Rubin
5W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Andrea Pucci
9W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Kathy McKeon
0W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Fallon-Hanley
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Noreen Nezaj
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.