Teams

The Racketeers

2025 3.0 Flex · 3.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 2.75 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-08vs Grip N RipWon 21
L#1 SinglesRahul Singh vs Nicolas Maderafont3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesPeter Ratcliffe vs Trevor Nelson6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesSamuel Thornberry vs Kahlil Saad6-4, 7-5
2025-05-01vs Grip N RipWon 30
W#1 SinglesRahul Singh vs Anand Vennavelli6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCody O'brien vs Kahlil Saad6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesSamuel Thornberry vs Rizwan Nasir7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-24vs Grip N RipSplit 11
W#1 SinglesRahul Singh vs Trevor Nelson6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesCody O'brien vs Anand Vennavelli1-6, 1-6
2025-04-17vs Grip N RipLost 12
L#1 SinglesRahul Singh vs Nicolas Maderafont6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesPeter Ratcliffe vs Anand Vennavelli3-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesABDULLA NAIM vs Kahlil Saad4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-04-10vs Grip N RipLost 12
L#1 SinglesCody O'brien vs Nicolas Maderafont1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesABDULLA NAIM vs Rizwan Nasir3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesSamuel Thornberry vs Kahlil Saad7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-03vs Grip N RipLost 12
L#1 SinglesPeter Ratcliffe vs Nicolas Maderafont3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesABDULLA NAIM vs Anand Vennavelli1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesCody O'brien vs Trevor Nelson7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Rahul Singh
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.65
Peter Ratcliffe
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.54
Cody O'brien
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.52
ABDULLA NAIM
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.49
Samuel Thornberry
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cody O'brien + Samuel Thornberry2543% games+1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rahul Singh
20W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Peter Ratcliffe
25W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.65
3
Cody O'brien
6W–24L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
2.5
ABDULLA NAIM
21W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%44%56%
2.52
Samuel Thornberry
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.